"Atlanta or Gettysburg Cyclorama" Topic
11 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board
|
| Milhouse | 12 Jun 2012 8:44 p.m. PST |
We already nitpicked the Gettysburg Cyclorama for accuracy but I think concluded it's a great work of art. So….which is a better work of art: G'burg or Atlanta? Which do you like better (it may be different than which you think is technically better as pure art)? |
| Billy Yank | 13 Jun 2012 5:10 a.m. PST |
I liked Atlanta better… it had 3D figures integrated into it. Mark |
GROSSMAN  | 13 Jun 2012 5:37 a.m. PST |
Atlanta would be my choice. |
 SMPress  | 13 Jun 2012 5:45 a.m. PST |
Atlanta! Gburg was actually a disapointment for me… |
| GuyG13 | 13 Jun 2012 6:05 a.m. PST |
I liked the one at Waterloo the best |
| RudyNelson | 13 Jun 2012 8:28 a.m. PST |
Atlanta. I liked the seating that turned and the 3D model placed before the mural. |
| corporalpat | 13 Jun 2012 9:42 a.m. PST |
I second Waterloo! Then Atlanta, then Gettysburg. |
| Ed Mohrmann | 13 Jun 2012 11:17 a.m. PST |
|
| John Michael Priest | 13 Jun 2012 1:02 p.m. PST |
Atlanta is better. What makes it better than Gettysburg is that the guests sit in the middle and the seats rotate to study the painting. It's easier for us short fellas who can't get to the front of the herd. |
 zippyfusenet | 13 Jun 2012 2:21 p.m. PST |
I thought the 3D figures in the Atlanta Cyclorama were WPA work from the 1930s. I didn't like them – thought they clashed with the style of the painting. |
Bottom Dollar  | 13 Jun 2012 5:18 p.m. PST |
I remember Waterloo, but not the cyclorama. Never been to Atlanta. Gettysburg's the best, artistically speaking IMHO. |
|
