"Obergeis Scenario for CWC" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2015) Message Board Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board Back to the Modern Scenarios Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article As the holiday season approaches, overstock toys of previous years show up in the dollar stores.
Featured Profile Article Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| TheTabletopGamer | 13 May 2012 11:05 a.m. PST |
I've made a few changes to the Obergeis Scenario found in GHQ's Micro Armour: Modern rules so that it is ready to be used for Cold War Commander, I have intentionally been vague about specific units to allow players to customise their forces a bit. I doubt it will work for those of you who must have a fixed points limit so that it's a perfectly even game, but it should be ok if you just want a bit of fun, and a challenge!
Enjoy
TTG |
| bruntonboy | 13 May 2012 11:47 a.m. PST |
Forces look rather too even for an attack defence game IMHO. Maybe replacing Warpac battalions with Regiments might even it up a bit. |
| TheTabletopGamer | 13 May 2012 12:05 p.m. PST |
I was thinking that too, but I've pretty much taken everything from the GHQ Rules and translated it for CWC, I agree that WARPAC Should have more forces avaliable to them, I guess players can decide how many units they have exactly etc. |
|
