Help support TMP


""Conan the Barbarian" movie: new or old?" Topic


71 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Fantasy Media Message Board


Action Log

09 Sep 2016 12:48 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Changed title from ""Conan the Barbarian" movie: new or old?" to ""Conan the Barbarian" movie: new or old?"
  • Removed from Fantasy Discussion board
  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board
  • Crossposted to Fantasy Media board

Areas of Interest

Fantasy

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Fantasy Hack


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Profile Article

The Simtac Tour

The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


4,371 hits since 3 May 2012
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Pages: 1 2 

USAFpilot03 May 2012 5:44 p.m. PST

Which Conan movie did you like better, the new one or the old one with Arnold?

I think the actor in the new one looks like Conan, but the old Conan movie has a better story, better script and better music.

Dynaman878903 May 2012 5:54 p.m. PST

Old – it has AHRNOLD. Nuff said.

I do like the new one, despite it many flaws, though.

chuck05 Fezian03 May 2012 5:55 p.m. PST

THe old one.

ming3103 May 2012 5:58 p.m. PST

Old was a better move , new was a better Conan. Too much shoehorned into the second movie

Ed the Two Hour Wargames guy03 May 2012 6:02 p.m. PST

Old

John the OFM03 May 2012 6:06 p.m. PST

Old.

Garand03 May 2012 6:06 p.m. PST

Old. I think Momoa could make for a good Conan if he's directed better and given better lines.

Damon.

CPBelt03 May 2012 6:11 p.m. PST

Neither. Both are horrid. Hopefully no more Conan movies will be made during my lifetime! Or during the lifetime of my grandchildren! Did I mention both films are horrid?

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP03 May 2012 6:28 p.m. PST

Jason Momoa looks more like Conan – but the first movie was way better

mrwigglesworth03 May 2012 6:29 p.m. PST

Both, but the 1st was better…

Sloppypainter03 May 2012 6:29 p.m. PST

Old!

jpattern203 May 2012 6:37 p.m. PST

Old.

You can search TMP for other threads about the new movie, from back when it was in theaters. I thought it sucked on many, many levels. The only thing I really liked about it was the CGI landscapes. Most of them were very well done.

I thought Momoa was a horrible Conan, far too beetle-browed. Not that Schwarzenegger was any closer to the book-Conan, but I thought he did a much better job.

SonofThor03 May 2012 6:39 p.m. PST

The Ahnald one is a better movie all around but both movies miss the mark as far as being true to R.E.H.'s character.

J Womack 9403 May 2012 6:40 p.m. PST

Old one.

darthfozzywig03 May 2012 6:44 p.m. PST

Crom laughs at your remake!

Personal logo etotheipi Sponsoring Member of TMP03 May 2012 6:45 p.m. PST

Red Sonja

John Leahy Sponsoring Member of TMP03 May 2012 6:47 p.m. PST

Definitely Arnold's version.

elsyrsyn03 May 2012 6:49 p.m. PST

Neither. Read the books instead.

Doug

Jojojimmyjohn03 May 2012 7:01 p.m. PST

Beastmaster

Katzbalger03 May 2012 7:02 p.m. PST

Old one--better music (by FAR as I had forgotten the music from the new one the second I left the theater but the music from the old one helped me get through boot camp) and a bit better overall story. I refering to the director's cut of the old one, which adds a little dialogue and modifies the end slightly.

Rob

Weird WWII03 May 2012 7:12 p.m. PST

Old!

Brian

Sundance03 May 2012 7:28 p.m. PST

Old.

21eRegt03 May 2012 7:44 p.m. PST

Old. I enjoyed it for what it was back in the day. I accepted the new one for a remake showcasing special effects.

Agesilaus03 May 2012 7:48 p.m. PST

Arnold

richarDISNEY03 May 2012 8:00 p.m. PST

Conan the Destroyer rules!
Not kidding!
beer

elcid109903 May 2012 8:28 p.m. PST

Old. Original was superb.

The new version is a dogs breakfast and the less said about Destroyer the better.

Broadsword03 May 2012 9:54 p.m. PST

Old. It started a flood of low-budget, direct to video favorites like the four Deathstalker movies.

Al | ravenfeastsmeadhall.blogspot.com

Flat Beer and Cold Pizza03 May 2012 9:55 p.m. PST

Old for me, too. I loved that movie. Besides, how often do you see James Earl Jones playing a bad guy?

Striker03 May 2012 10:15 p.m. PST

The old one.

Beastmaster

Not the "I'm Dar" Beastmaster I hope.

Patrick R04 May 2012 1:53 a.m. PST

The old one is the better film overall, but is CINO, Conan in name only. The new one was much closer to Howard's fiction, but fell into the trap of having a world-conquering villain plotline.

djbthesecond04 May 2012 1:58 a.m. PST

old

andyfb04 May 2012 2:00 a.m. PST

Old

ZULUPAUL Supporting Member of TMP04 May 2012 2:05 a.m. PST

Old

Uesugi Kenshin Supporting Member of TMP04 May 2012 2:13 a.m. PST

The new one actually made me want to demand my $ back!

SgtPerry04 May 2012 2:50 a.m. PST

Old

flicking wargamer04 May 2012 3:46 a.m. PST

Old.

skippy000104 May 2012 5:21 a.m. PST

The young Conan in the new version was Conan to me.

Dropzonetoe Fezian04 May 2012 5:50 a.m. PST

I just watched the new one a couple of days ago and have to say that I was happier than I expected to be by it.

I've seen the old one more times than I can count and will watch it again, hell I own the DVD for it. The new one I might catch someday and watch it again but I will not be going out of my way to do so.

I hope this makes sense but the movie is too good? The fight scenes are too choreographed, the special effects too glossy. Everything is too tight, too Hollywood, and I think it loses some of the "grit" I was expecting to see in a Conan movie.

Prince of Persia, Pirates of the Caribbean, and a slew of modern movies seem to have a problem with this as well.

They feel too "movie" for me. In Desperado when the throwing knives were being chucked at Steve's character they kind of whizzed here and there. Take that next to the CGI follow the path while matrix dodging of throwing axes and arrows that happens now, I'd rather have the first choice. It was the practicalness and not hyper realistic approach that made me like stuff like the 13th Warrior rather than sword fights on a rolling water wheels like other movies seem to like so much these days.

The original had weight and grit the new one has gloss. I just prefer the grit.

Mick A04 May 2012 6:35 a.m. PST

New. Arnold never looked right and played him to dumb. I think the new one is closer to the original stories…

Mick

Dedthom04 May 2012 7:08 a.m. PST

The first movie, not the second in the series or the newest. Although, Ron Pearlman is in the newest so that is one saving grace.

Goose66604 May 2012 7:12 a.m. PST

Old.. the new one is ok, but like the older ones better.

Photonred04 May 2012 7:33 a.m. PST

Old

mad monkey 104 May 2012 8:29 a.m. PST
just visiting04 May 2012 8:41 a.m. PST

I have not seen the Momoa version; the trailers were quite enough, thank you.

Musically, nothing comes close to a Basil Poledouris film score. I have the new double CD set, the COMPLETE score, all c. 100 minutes of it; fabulous listening! I haven't watched the actual movie in years, though….

Personal logo javelin98 Supporting Member of TMP04 May 2012 8:54 a.m. PST

Old!

corporalpat04 May 2012 9:18 a.m. PST

The old one. The new one was too uneven and flashy.

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP04 May 2012 10:25 a.m. PST

Another old. I didn't even see the new one.

CeruLucifus04 May 2012 10:28 a.m. PST

I thought the recent film with Jason Momoa was much more in the Conan spirit and in particular the young Conan origin sequence is much more believable.

I am in a minority in that I never thought the Schwarzenegger Conan films were very good.

The first one crammed too many stories into one and I agree Conan was played wrong, not as smart as in the stories. The origin is completely out of character as well -- the idea that Conan would spend his teenaged years as a slave pushing a grain mill is counter to everything Howard wrote. Teenage Conan was running around in warbands plundering -- "The Frost Giant's Daughter" happens at the tail end of this period. Howard only ever imprisioned Conan as a plot device to get him to escape into a new locale. Plenty of other adaptions of Conan are clued into this -- portrayals of Conan in chains are short and quickly resolved, usually violently.

I never saw the later Schwarzenegger films except for channel surfed snippets that did nothing to convince me they were watchable.

As for the score of the Schwarzenegger films, I am a punk rocker, I never listen to movie scores. I am always surprised to find someone who does and who puts them on during miniatures games. I have no issue with that actually -- different strokes for different folks. But let's remember movies are a visual medium first. By praising a movie for its score, you are condemning it with your faint praise.

kreoseus204 May 2012 11:37 a.m. PST

What is the best thing in a Conan movie ?

blacksmith04 May 2012 12:46 p.m. PST

The old one has a dark, cruel and sinister atmosphere that you don't see anymore in nowadays films.
It's got Arnold, and a fantastic soundtrack too!
Old of course

Pages: 1 2