| Smokey Roan | 02 May 2012 4:17 p.m. PST |
It just sucks that WOTC discontinued it. They screwed up a great line with there short sighted schemes. Somebody needs to re-issue the damn figures!!!!!! |
| richarDISNEY | 02 May 2012 5:32 p.m. PST |
Well, the painting went downhill
But they were still re-paintable
And they were available for a long time.
 |
| CPBelt | 02 May 2012 6:02 p.m. PST |
What were their short sighted schemes? Plenty singles are available cheaply on the secondary markets. I think the demand for the figures ran its course from what I've read. Same with D&D in general. Hasbro's game divisions are hurting badly this year, with Magic propping up the losses from being too extreme. Richard, I'm sure the painting went downhill each time they had to find a new plant in China due to rising labor costs (or actual enforcement of labor laws, causing increased labor costs) over there. Retain same profit margin, lesser quality product. This is an age old story in China recounted in all the business mags. Wizkids found this out a number of times. |
| Smokey Roan | 03 May 2012 6:58 a.m. PST |
What part of "collectable, mystery boxes of figures" do you find not short sighted? |
| GoneNow | 03 May 2012 10:43 a.m. PST |
An 8 year run to me is not really "short sighted". But I do agree that it would have been better if they had avoided the random closed box approach. |
| Ghostrunner | 04 May 2012 9:32 a.m. PST |
They ran into the problem of how do we keep coming up with new pieces, especially if they are NOT more powerful than the old ones. I played the game for pretty much it's entire run. Overall it was pretty well done. As I understand it, they only planned on 4 sets, and they went up to 10(?). They might have been able to extend the longevity of the game a little bit if they had added some complexity up front, but overall I think it worked out pretty well. |
| alien BLOODY HELL surfer | 05 May 2012 2:33 a.m. PST |
Now if they had any sense they'd re-release the figures in a different game style, not randomly, without the cards forthe previous game (thus not making things uber rare etc) and sell them either individudally or in packs of useful collections. |
| Farstar | 07 May 2012 3:19 p.m. PST |
The marketing gaffe of not ever cross-selling to the RPG was worse. They simply assumed people would know they could be used that way. |
| infojunky | 07 May 2012 11:44 p.m. PST |
Not sure WOTC can rerelease them, depends what FFG's license looks like. |
| Smokey Roan | 08 May 2012 5:10 p.m. PST |
I was amazed the game was played at all in it's intended form. Would like to know why it is not viable to continue the lines, as figures only and not the card. Stay far away from their rules, and you can find some great Star Wars gaming using those figures. |
| ToxWeb | 08 May 2012 8:20 p.m. PST |
Go to Amazon and look up "Dungeon Command". New WOTC prepainted minis in non-random themed sets. The first two sets in July will have a Drow theme and a Cormyr theme. Later in the year, there will be a goblin set and an undead set. Some of the minis will be completely new, and others will be repainted versions of old sculpts. |
| Marc the plastics fan | 09 May 2012 8:47 a.m. PST |
And the Dungeon Command will fit in with Star Wars in what way? |
| Ghostrunner | 09 May 2012 9:32 a.m. PST |
I suspect if 'Dungeon Command' revitalizes DDM, they might take a look at renewing SWM. |
| Farstar | 09 May 2012 1:36 p.m. PST |
They would need to reacquire the license first. |
| ToxWeb | 10 May 2012 3:06 p.m. PST |
Q: And the Dungeon Command will fit in with Star Wars in what way? A: Since I came across this thread in the Collectible Gaming Miniatures, the topic is "Any word on WOTC CGM figures? Anyone gonna re-issue?", and the OP never said "I am only talking about Star Wars minis", I was not aware that D&D minis were irrelevant. |
| Marc the plastics fan | 15 May 2012 5:04 a.m. PST |
Tox – good point, and I graciously apologise for being too picky too soon. My bad. |
| Scorpio | 31 May 2012 1:51 p.m. PST |
But I do agree that it would have been better if they had avoided the random closed box approach. Better for you, maybe. But they were always good sellers, so it worked out for the company. |