Help support TMP


"Printer Settings for Paper Models" Topic


17 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Paper Modeling Message Board


Action Log

07 Oct 2016 11:12 a.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board

Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Profile Article

Jot Wood Magnet

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian finds bases at the dollar store!


Current Poll


1,234 hits since 26 Apr 2012
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian26 Apr 2012 3:14 p.m. PST

When printing paper models on cardstock, Fat Dragon Games recommends not using the "cardstock" printer setting, claiming that you'll get better results with the "plain paper" setting.

Which setting works best for you?

* cardstock
* plain paper

14Bore26 Apr 2012 3:34 p.m. PST

Been using plain paper from the get go, works fine.

taskforce5826 Apr 2012 3:45 p.m. PST

I left it at plain paper (the default) too. I've tried cardstock once or twice before and didn't notice any real difference.

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP26 Apr 2012 4:04 p.m. PST

Plain paper here. Hadn't actually notice there *was* a "cardstock" setting. The cynical part of me suspects it's a way for users to waste more ink…

Cherno26 Apr 2012 4:09 p.m. PST

Plain paper, high quality. However, this is only true for matte paper, I'm pretty sure that glossy photo paper needs other parameters.

Sundance26 Apr 2012 4:38 p.m. PST

Never even thought of changing settings.

Coyotepunc and Hatshepsuut26 Apr 2012 6:07 p.m. PST

Plain paper setting here.

Personal logo FingerandToeGlenn Sponsoring Member of TMP26 Apr 2012 7:23 p.m. PST

Plain paper for me as well. Occasionally I spring for photo quality, but that's the only time I change my settings (well, except for when my wife has switched printers and changes settings on me).

Toshach Sponsoring Member of TMP26 Apr 2012 8:16 p.m. PST

Yup. Leave it on the default settings.

Sergeant Paper26 Apr 2012 9:05 p.m. PST

I use the 'thick paper' setting, mainly because its set up to feed that thru from the top instead of in the front and back out the front. That way I stock regular paper in the front tray, and just drop card into the top slot when I'm printing models.

thosmoss26 Apr 2012 9:06 p.m. PST

Got my own printer only recently. Tried printing on card stock, it came out terribly. Patches of ink were missing from solid areas, track marks ran from one end of the page to the other.

I changed the settings to "110# stock", and the output is much improved. Not perfect, but hey, it's for gaming.

corporalpat26 Apr 2012 9:21 p.m. PST

I use the plain paper setting with the cheapest brand of uncoated card stock available and have great results. If you are using high quality paper or coated stock you will probably need to adjust. Photo paper will need to be adjusted to your photo setting. I have tried photo paper, premium card stock, and cheap card stock and found that the image quality was not significantly better to justify the cost of the better paper.

corporalpat26 Apr 2012 9:24 p.m. PST

thosmoss

Sounds to me more like your nozzles were dry. Happens on my printer when I have not used it for a while.

GildasFacit Sponsoring Member of TMP27 Apr 2012 4:00 a.m. PST

Depends on the printer and the paper/card.

Inkjets MAY have a thickness issue when using a 'paper' setting when printing on card and this can cause smearing. Happened with a Cannon and an Epson printer for me and using the thick or card settings solved the problem.

Cheap card tends to have a rougher surface too and that can cause quality issues if you try to use too high a quality setting. You can end up getting worse results with high quality than with the normal setting.

On a laser it is advisable to use the thick or card settings as this usually increases the fusing temperature and makes sure that you don't get unfused toner rubbing off the card surface.

I'd agree that uncoated card is better – coated card tends to crack when folded. You are best getting a good smooth surface though – hot pressed card is worth the extra IMHO.

ETenebrisLux27 Apr 2012 6:24 a.m. PST

Yup, definitely a difference with the colour Laser printer.

AndrewGPaul28 Apr 2012 10:12 a.m. PST

I usually use 170g/sqm matte photo paper, with the printer set to "high quality", "matte photo paper".Seems to come out fine to me. The paper is certainly sturdy enough, and will even support the weight of miniatures.

Who asked this joker30 Apr 2012 4:29 a.m. PST

Got a MagiColor 2400W here. I use the thick stock setting and it works fine. The thing I have noticed is that the paper feeds more slowly through the printer. This is probably for the reasons GildasFacit states above about Lasers. Same effect for photo paper. Occasionally I forget to set to Thick Stock and still have had no problems. Much of the setting on my printer is probably to ease the wear and tear of the printer.

Whatever the case, the answer clearly depends on the type, make and model of your printer.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.