"Force on Force: Long Minimum Arming Distance" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board
Action Log
03 Sep 2016 5:43 p.m. PST by Editor in Chief Bill
- Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board
- Crossposted to Cold War (1946-1989) board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Editor in Chief Bill | 25 Apr 2012 3:40 p.m. PST |
When playing Osprey/Ambush Alley Games Force on Force, do you use the Long Minimum Arming Distance optional rule? (Found in Cold War Gone Hot) (In the basic game, all ATGMs have the same minimum ranges; with the optional rules, certain ATGMs have an extended minimum range.) |
whoa Mohamed | 25 Apr 2012 4:25 p.m. PST |
I have not tried them yet but i don't think im convinced they where really needed but then again at the short distances replicated no one would be able to fire pre ultramodern ATGMS so maybe it will balance things out a little more |
Oddball | 27 Apr 2012 9:16 a.m. PST |
I'm running a game at Historicon and will use the Long Minimum Arming Distance. Give a chance for light APC / AFV to close with the defense before suffereing heavy losses. |
|