"Rumanian Destroyers WWII" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWI/WWII Naval Painting Guides Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War One World War Two at Sea
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleCan a WWII blockgame find happiness as a miniatures campaign system?
Featured Profile ArticleThe Editor tries out this first-year gaming convention in the San Francisco Bay Area (California).
Featured Book Review
|
HistoryPhD | 18 Mar 2012 12:02 p.m. PST |
I have the 2 Mărăşti class destroyers to paint and I must confess that colors for the camouflage scheme and the deck are a complete mystery to me. Indeed, the camouflage pattern itself is also. I would guess that they were getting their paint from either the Germans or the Italians or quite likely from both. Anyone have any helpful observations, advice, etc.? Thanks!! |
John the OFM | 18 Mar 2012 5:22 p.m. PST |
According to Wikipedia, they were built in Italy in 1916 for Rumania, and served in both the Great War and WWII. If you wanted a Great War paint scheme, I would ASSUME that they used the Italian camo scheme. However, since you posted in WWII
BTW, why do you assume there was no native Rumanian paint industry? Just to complicate things. |
Grelber | 18 Mar 2012 6:35 p.m. PST |
My copy of Jane's Fighting Ships of World War II has a 1932 photo of one of the two destroyers. The ship is largely a light gray, with a dark line just above the waterline (traditionally a red in other navies, I think). The ship has three funnels, each with a dark line around the top. The third funnel has two lines around it, which makes me think this may be some sort of a designator, so you can tell the ships apart. There are also 1944 photos of a minelayer and a gunboat. These look like they started in the same light gray, but now have three different shades of darker triangles on them, creating a sort of dazzle camouflage. FWIW, Janes says the ships were ordered by Rumania in 1913, tanke over by Italy in 1915, and repurchased by Rumania in 1920. So any action they saw in WWI would have been while flying the Italian flag. Grelber |
HistoryPhD | 18 Mar 2012 7:56 p.m. PST |
Maybe I'm praying that there wasn't a native paint industry, just to simplify things! And yes, I am interested in just WWII camouflage and deck colors |
Mal Wright | 09 Aug 2012 6:38 p.m. PST |
The ships were painted in a very distinctive scheme that was a combination of dazzle and Italian ideas, Each ship had a specific id built into the scheme. Decks were originally red brown but overpainted to grey. Because they operated in a zone where Italian aircraft patrolled, they carried the red and white barber stripes on the upper deck at the bow. After being taken over by the ummmm
.friendly
. Soviets
the decks reverted to red brown, but the one illustration I have seen would seem to show that they did not have the camouflage painted out for some time. The colours used in the schemes were a series of greys, with black and dark green. The ships of the Romanian Navy will be part of one of my upcoming camouflage books in the HIDING IN THE OPEN series. |
PVT641 | 14 Aug 2013 11:41 a.m. PST |
By chance what scale are these? 1/2400? If so where did you buy them? |
|