Help support TMP


"Why not the Renaissance for you?" Topic


78 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Wargaming in General Message Board

Back to the Renaissance Discussion Message Board


Action Log

08 Oct 2014 6:58 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from Medieval Discussion board
  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board
  • Crossposted to Wargaming in General board

Areas of Interest

General
Renaissance

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Battle-Market: Tannenberg 1410

The Editor tries out a boardgame - yes, a boardgame - from battle-market magazine.


Featured Workbench Article

Adam Paints Three More Pirates

It's back to pirates for Adam8472 Fezian!


Featured Profile Article

Mini Wooden Palettes

Building blocks?


Featured Book Review


4,449 hits since 3 Oct 2011
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Pages: 1 2 

Uesugi Kenshin Supporting Member of TMP03 Oct 2011 3:06 p.m. PST

What has kept you from wargaming the Renaissance period if you dont already?

Captain dEwell03 Oct 2011 3:14 p.m. PST

Men in tights (pantyhose) really.

Sundance03 Oct 2011 3:17 p.m. PST

No interest in the wars of the period.

Patrice03 Oct 2011 3:30 p.m. PST

Other interesting periods first.

But all periods are interesting if you look at them closely, so perhaps some day I'll do the Renaissance too.

But I'm afraid of painting such complicated slashed clothes.

Garand03 Oct 2011 3:37 p.m. PST

Don't like the costumes, and for all the armored knightly action that I need, I can just play WotR or earlier…

Damon.

Pan Marek03 Oct 2011 3:45 p.m. PST

For many, it seems to be the difficulty in finding rules that provide a realistic/historical model of how pikes interacted with shot.

greenknight4 Sponsoring Member of TMP03 Oct 2011 3:54 p.m. PST

Just not into it.

CeruLucifus03 Oct 2011 4:08 p.m. PST

I've never really thought of it as a period that lent itself to wargaming. I'm not sure if that's because I think of the cultural movement and that associates it in my mind with creativity and with cities, or because I've never seen it gamed. Or both.

Ten Fingered Jack03 Oct 2011 4:19 p.m. PST

Painting all that slashed clothing!

richarDISNEY03 Oct 2011 4:23 p.m. PST

No interest.
beer

Gonsalvo03 Oct 2011 4:33 p.m. PST

Goodness, how about the pluses of the period:

Striking looking battlefields with all that slashed costume, bold heraldic type flags, etc!

Extreme tactical richness in an era when warfare was in a state of flux – bows, crossbows, firearms, javelins, pikes, sword and bucklers, 2H swords and halberds, Knights, lancers, true light cavalry of several varieties, and the earliest functional field artillery… and each with its role to play.

Battles that are relatively small in scope, and thus very suitable for rules emphasizing the tactical nuances of the period.

Politics so devious they inspired Machiavelli to write "The Prince", with kings, nobles, wealthy bankers and the church all trying to pull various strings.

The final repulse of the Ottoman thrust to extend their conquests into central Europe… and with that add Jannisaries, Sipais, Akinjis etc to the mix.

An embarrassment of riches with regard to figures lately, at least in 28mm.

An era of history that *isn't* well known , and yet was pivotal to the development of both European Nation-States and the Islamic world; one that saw the Age of Discovery and the colonization/conquest of the New World. Limited sources is frustrating at times, but you won't go broke buying the latest book rehashing Waterloo and Grouchy's role for the 20th time.

Peter

My Band of Brothers 2nd Edition (Piquet) website:

gonsalvo.com

Even if the rules aren't your cup of tea, lots of visuals and battle reports there, both Land and Sea.

Sysiphus03 Oct 2011 5:00 p.m. PST

Well it is the "cup" actually. I find the "cod pieces" very off putting grin.

Pizzagrenadier03 Oct 2011 5:43 p.m. PST

No interest in the weaponry, uniforms, or tactics. I think the period has some interesting history, but not a draw for wargaming for me.

Old Contemptibles03 Oct 2011 5:46 p.m. PST

Low priority. More interesting periods come first. If you count the ECW as part of this period then it is on my to do list but not near the top of my list. So many periods so little time.

Bob in Edmonton03 Oct 2011 5:55 p.m. PST

Just starting the period now; I always found the uniforms daunting and the history is rather "messy" (versus, say, the AWI where you can easily get a handle on things). I'm enjoying the painting though and the few games I've played (DBA-RRR) were fairly fun.

Grelber03 Oct 2011 5:57 p.m. PST

Very early Renaissance, but I'd like to do the 1445 campaign in Greece. Unfortunately nobody makes the figures in 28mm, so I'd have to do conversions, and I keep getting drawn away to periods for which I can get the figures.
Grelber

Prince Alberts Revenge03 Oct 2011 6:02 p.m. PST

I love the period (and have plenty of figures for the period), but haven't found rules that I love.

Condottiere03 Oct 2011 6:15 p.m. PST

I love the period (and have plenty of figures for the period), but haven't found rules that I love.

Ditto.

SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER03 Oct 2011 6:31 p.m. PST

Who said I'm not into it? Come on fess up!!!!!!!!!!!!

Katzbalger03 Oct 2011 6:36 p.m. PST

"I love the period (and have plenty of figures for the period), but haven't found rules that I love."


"Ditto."

Ditto as well.

GamesPoet Supporting Member of TMP03 Oct 2011 7:15 p.m. PST

The only thing keeping me at the moment, are getting my figures constructed and painted, and choosing a set of rules.

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP03 Oct 2011 7:20 p.m. PST

No "signature battle" to spark my interest.

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP03 Oct 2011 7:50 p.m. PST

Simply not interested in the time period or the accompanying military actions.

Sysiphus03 Oct 2011 8:10 p.m. PST

FoG dropped some of my fav armies into the bin…so no not interested now. *thumbs down*

Dances with Clydesdales03 Oct 2011 8:32 p.m. PST

Painting those uniforms…

jdpintex03 Oct 2011 9:22 p.m. PST

I haven't found a decent set of rules that are both playable and reflect Pike & Shot. Although to be fair there aren't that many rulesets out there that weren't originally written for some other period.

Renaud S03 Oct 2011 9:41 p.m. PST

I am afraid of the storage needed for all those pikes (same for greek phalanx, etc).

Uesugi Kenshin Supporting Member of TMP03 Oct 2011 11:43 p.m. PST

@Gonsalvo, I appreciate your enthusiastic post!

I am actually a (huge) fan of several renaissance periods (Poles, Scots vrs English, Italian Wars), but I havent started collecting yet for several reasons…hence the poll.

My main reasons for stalling are as follows. I originally wanted to collect the above listed armies in 15mm but couldnt find 15mm minis I was happy with so settled on 25/28mm. Regardless of the army, 15mm minis did not seem to do justice to a renaissance army.

For the Scots Wars, I have settled on Flodden, but havent settled on minis yet. I'm thinking I may just go with Perry conversions at this point.

For the Italian Wars, its basically come down to that I havent settled on a single historical battle to focus on. I may just end up collecting a generic early Spanish and French army eventually. TAG and Perry both have nice minis there.

For Poles, it comes down to the fact that I havent chosen a historical enemy for them yet (being a solo gamer I need two armies when starting a new project!). Cant decide b/t Cossacks, Tartars, Swedes, or Russians (Not a Turks fan.

I'm open to suggestions! ;-)

By far the largest impediment to playing renaissance games & collecting minis has been finding a set of rules that has gripped me though. Glad/sad to see from those who posted above that I'm not the only one!

Uesugi Kenshin Supporting Member of TMP04 Oct 2011 12:03 a.m. PST

@Extra Crispy

Re: "No "signature battle" to spark my interest."

I suggest you read up on Sekigahara Brother! Perfect battle for renaissance (horse, musket, pike & sword all used!). Although its a huge battle its manageble if you do it with 10mm minis. Extremely fun to paint too!

Samurai armor of this late period is not as challenging as many fear. Armor is either laqured black or rust brown (1 red unit on the Tokugawa side). Back banners can be downloaded off the computer rather than painting.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sekigahara
link
link
TMP link
link

Klibanophoros04 Oct 2011 1:46 a.m. PST

An awesome period but a nightmare to paint. I certainly have a few half finished armies to prove it!

Frothers Did It And Ran Away04 Oct 2011 1:57 a.m. PST

It's a fantastic period but..

1) I have enough unpainted figures to get through without starting a new one.

2) The history is slightly bewildering. Duchy of this, Elector of that, Hapsburgs, Valois, Medici, Borgia, Italy a maelstrom of competing city states, condotteiri swapping sides – the map of Europe is too fractured to be able to relate it to modern nation states in your head. This is the same problem I find with the C18th. I find it's not a period I could dabble in for fear of not doing it justice. I'd need to get really into it and I just don't have the time or the motivation required to do so.

lutonjames04 Oct 2011 2:21 a.m. PST

Alex- it's easier than most to do justice to as you can start of with small states confrontations and then move the troops onto a slightly higher stage.

Field Marshal04 Oct 2011 2:42 a.m. PST

Real men game the Renaissance! ;P
my reasons for gaming the Italian Wars-

link

Jamesonsafari04 Oct 2011 3:39 a.m. PST

Meh.
Visually it doesn't grab me, so no excitement to paint.
And tactically I wish they'd make up their mind; are they medieval push of pike or are they horse and musket? (that's some satire by the way)
the rules we've tried have also been crap too.

I think there's so much change that one set of rules to try and cover everything from 1500-1700 is going to have troubles.

I also feel the Samurai Sengoku period to be separate from the Renaissance. THAT I would play if I had the time and money.

Dynaman878904 Oct 2011 3:51 a.m. PST

No Tigers, only half in jest.

Costanzo104 Oct 2011 4:09 a.m. PST

I am with Gonsalvo, but I find three limits: rules is the lesser,because seeing also other periods we have mediocre sets of rules and their amazing growing number prove it; a bigger limit is the poor publications about the period, books very limited in numbers, covering only in part the richness of the age and old… not very attractive; last, often connected with the quality of pubblications, a limited offer by the miniatures firms.

Gennorm04 Oct 2011 5:28 a.m. PST

It's a great period – very colourful, different organisations and tactics, developing organisations and tactics, fascinating political/religious/cultural background, interesting characters, plenty of documented battles. I don't understand why anyone wouldn't want to game it.

The King of Rock and Roll04 Oct 2011 5:54 a.m. PST

No plastic 28s.

TodCreasey04 Oct 2011 6:32 a.m. PST

Rules for me too. I love the idea of the ECW and of the 16th century time of transition but I am not taken by any rules.

Costanzo104 Oct 2011 7:00 a.m. PST

Rules,rules,..if you are fond of Napoleonic or Ancient you have more set of rules , don' t have better rules, we are living a "wargaming age" with a lot of rules of medium or poor quality.

GamesPoet Supporting Member of TMP04 Oct 2011 7:29 a.m. PST

No plastic 28s.

For what part of the Renaissance are you referring? There are some plastic 28mm for at least some parts.

Daffy Doug04 Oct 2011 7:33 a.m. PST

I hate guns….

The Last Conformist04 Oct 2011 7:42 a.m. PST

Do my 1470s Germans count? Until I got into historical wargaming I'd taken for granted they did, but wargamers seem to tend to take the Renaissance as beginning very late (and to end really late).

There's no particular reasons I don't have any 16th (or 17th) century armies, it's just that, as for many periods, nobody around here plays it and I haven't been bitten by the inspiration bug to start an "independent" project. Same reason as why I don't have any 16th century BC armies.

dayglowill04 Oct 2011 8:41 a.m. PST

Time, money and the other periods and genres that are just a little bit higher up the interest scale.

Ron W DuBray04 Oct 2011 8:45 a.m. PST

no interest, never even read a book on any of the wars in that time, and I've never seen a movie that I remember being about a Renaissance war.

But then again I have gaps from vikings to WWII and WWII to modern/near future.

RABeery04 Oct 2011 8:55 a.m. PST

It's my favorite period that I don't game. Got some figs, but the late medieval period is too close and wins out.

Pan Marek04 Oct 2011 9:24 a.m. PST

Uesugi-
SWEDES! Poles v. Swedes pits two very different armies against each other. A challenge for both commanders.

Condottiere04 Oct 2011 9:30 a.m. PST

1470s definitely falls within the period.

Patrice04 Oct 2011 10:02 a.m. PST

I've never seen a movie that I remember being about a Renaissance war.

Paul Verhoeven's "Flesh & Blood" (1985)! There are at least a few scenes in that film that you would remember (although not the battle scenes…)

Ed the Two Hour Wargames guy04 Oct 2011 10:34 a.m. PST

I do the Italian Wars in the late 1400's. I use RRtK and enjoy it as it's easy to put the armies together as all the Italian City States used similar troops. This allows me to field a six player campaign with minimal figures.

Here are some links

Part one
link

Part Two

link

Rally Round the King is army size battles with DBA based troops. Easy to find them on eBay at a good price and already painted.

Pages: 1 2