Help support TMP


"SBS Falklands - Battle of Fanning Head?" Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Scenarios Message Board

Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2015) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

FUBAR


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

My AK47 Regulars

I promised to show pictures of the AK47 army that I'm painting - here are the regular forces.


Featured Profile Article

White Night #2: Save the Choppers

Can Harriers protect Sea Apaches and Seahawks from hostile Tornados and Mirage 2000s?


Featured Book Review


2,283 hits since 17 Sep 2011
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Mako1117 Sep 2011 11:22 p.m. PST

Anyone have any more details on this battle by the 3 SBS vs. about half a company of Argentinians?

Apparently, 25 SBS troops, including one naval gunfire support director assaulted Fanning Head, in order to remove the 60 – 64 troops known to be dug into the area.

The Argentinians were equipped with two recoilless rifles, and at least one 81mm mortar, in addition to their other weapons. At least one round from a recoilless rifle was fired at the ships in San Carlos Sound, apparently without effect.

The SBS were dropped off by helo at night, after some delay, since the helo couldn't take off with all of the equipment with SBS troops wanted to carry, initially. Several sorties were required to ferry all the troops and equipment ashore.

They then advanced onto the Argentine positions using a night vision device, detecting the enemy when at about 1,000 yds. range.

The SBS were heavily armed, sporting 9 x GPMG's in their small force, and apparently at least one 60mm mortar. Another account mentions M203 grenade launchers, and LAWs being fired at the Argentinians.

Apparently, the NGFS from the ship was late in arriving, since they couldn't get the 4.5" gun to fire, so they opted for 60mm mortar support instead at first, along with the MG fire. Supposedly, the gunfire support, once called in, lasted for 2 – 3 hours.

I'd like to know a bit more about the armament for both sides, if anyone has more info, as well as a more detailed account of the battle, since it might make for an interesting scenario.

whoa Mohamed18 Sep 2011 6:57 a.m. PST

Im toying with the same Idea have as much info as you, so nothing to add But….
I thought the Mission was a raid to destroy the Aircraft and Facilities of this small Airport.
The Argintine withdraw later was due to having no reason to stay as the Brits destroyed all 11 Aircraft and the Radar…Mikey

Russell Phillips20 Sep 2011 2:08 a.m. PST

I thought the Mission was a raid to destroy the Aircraft and Facilities of this small Airport.
The Argintine withdraw later was due to having no reason to stay as the Brits destroyed all 11 Aircraft and the Radar…Mikey

I think you're thinking of the Pebble Island raid by the SAS:

link

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.