Help support TMP


"Field Of Glory napoleonics" Topic


17 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Field of Glory: Napoleonics Message Board

Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board


Action Log

29 Dec 2016 10:32 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Crossposted to Field of Glory: Napoleonics board

Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

GallopingJack Checks Out The Terrain Mat

Mal Wright Fezian goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.


Featured Workbench Article

Thunderbolt Mountain Highlander

dampfpanzerwagon Fezian paints a Napoleonic caricature.


Featured Book Review


3,096 hits since 5 Aug 2011
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Rudysnelson05 Aug 2011 4:54 p.m. PST

I just read a facebook post by JD McNeil. he indicates that he just approved cover art for the new FoG napoleonics.
I am glad to see it hit the market.

Old Bear05 Aug 2011 5:04 p.m. PST

For me I'll be most interested in about 3 years when they release the PC version, assuming sales of the previous digital releases remain strong. I'm sure I'll buy FOG:N though regardless!

Sundance05 Aug 2011 5:51 p.m. PST

That will be interesting to see.

skinkmasterreturns05 Aug 2011 6:26 p.m. PST

I'm quite sure I'll buy it,and do it with 1/72 plastics.I really like the new figures that Hat Industry is putting out,they seem to be geared for the wargaming consumer.

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP05 Aug 2011 6:47 p.m. PST

^^^I think you are right about that.

quidveritas05 Aug 2011 7:15 p.m. PST

Please No! Not a good game model for Naps at all.

stecal Supporting Member of TMP05 Aug 2011 7:32 p.m. PST

I was in the FOGN beta test & I hated it. They are going their rules at the regimental level. The regiment was a purely administrative formation – it was battalions, brigades & divisions that Napoleonic armies fought in.

Austin Rob05 Aug 2011 9:47 p.m. PST

I was in the FOGN beta test & I hated it. They are going their rules at the regimental level. The regiment was a purely administrative formation – it was battalions, brigades & divisions that Napoleonic armies fought in.

Ha! That was exactly the reaction of our group.

Desert Rat06 Aug 2011 2:14 a.m. PST

Using "regiment" is somantics. If you hate a set of rules for trying to use a term that can be applied to most nations to describe a body of troops then…

Conquistador Carlos06 Aug 2011 5:20 a.m. PST

Regiment and Battalion are interchangable much of the time, if the Regiment has only 1 Battalion in the field. It's not really that big of a deal…

doug redshirt06 Aug 2011 1:57 p.m. PST

Except for the British, every other nations Regiment was 2 to 4 battalions on average. So a Regiment could really vary in size and area occupied.

frostydog06 Aug 2011 7:32 p.m. PST

To many other quality rules (Black Powder, Lasalle even WRG)out there to make me want to change. Tried FOG ancinets did'nt enthuse me at all.

Old Bear07 Aug 2011 4:28 a.m. PST

I must admit that I was very deflated by FOG:R having waited eagerly for a long time. Hence primarily my interest that in the future there may be a decent digital napoleonics set available.

Madmike107 Aug 2011 9:29 p.m. PST

Looking forward to FOG N, love both FOG A and FOG R. Big maybe is the basing system, my figures are based for Nappie Battles, not willing and most likely not able to rebase them.

Rudysnelson08 Aug 2011 6:36 a.m. PST

The concept of each base representing a company. i thought the original plan was for a 6 base or 8 base unit representing a battalion or regiment.

I am not sure how the final organization ended up.

I like that level of unit representation better than a 4 base unit representing an entire brigade.

Iron Chicken27 Aug 2011 10:10 a.m. PST

Only really tried POW naps & Grand Armee which are not really up to much, FOG napoleonics? not sure if it will work well but who knows!

I will sit on the fence for some time and see what the reaction to the rules is. I recently purchased FOGR as I enjoy the ancients set but not too sure about he Renaissance rules, we usually play POW R which gives a nice game albeit at the expense of a 6-7 hour game.

trailape28 Aug 2011 5:34 a.m. PST

Hmmm,.. I'm a big fan of Lasalle, and the basing works (to a fashion) with Age Of Eagles also, (which I also like). I can also play FPGA without having to rebase. The new 'Napoleon At War' rules appear interesting, and I can yet again get by with them without rebasing. Excellent!
So I can play from Battalion to Corps without rebasing with a few sets of rules that also play very well.
With a few 'individualy' based 'Big Men' and skirmishers I can even play SHARP PRACTICE, (though I have 28mm figs for that)
In short, if I have to rebase 1000s of 18mm figs to play FOG-N,… NO WAY.
;o)
Cheers

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.