| MarescialloDiCampo | 28 Jun 2011 8:11 a.m. PST |
Looking for modern rules to game modern potential or actual conflicts. |
| Scorpio | 28 Jun 2011 8:16 a.m. PST |
How many figs per side? 10-20 or 200? Desired scale? |
| CPT Jake | 28 Jun 2011 8:25 a.m. PST |
Why make this a poll suggestion vice asking for recommendations on the moderns board? |
DontFearDareaper  | 28 Jun 2011 8:26 a.m. PST |
For skirmish level modern and ultra-modern gaming, my wargaming club likes Force on Force. Dave |
| Henrix | 28 Jun 2011 8:30 a.m. PST |
|
| Angel Barracks | 28 Jun 2011 8:31 a.m. PST |
Many will say CWC (Cold War Commander) is your friend: link |
| 14th Brooklyn | 28 Jun 2011 8:34 a.m. PST |
The face of modern battle |
| Dynaman8789 | 28 Jun 2011 9:07 a.m. PST |
FFT3 looks good. (platoon stands) COD-TOB, with modern expansion available from the test of battle website (in the forum section) (also platoon stands) Force on Force for skirmish level. |
| dwight shrute | 28 Jun 2011 9:59 a.m. PST |
contact , modern crossfire ( volume of fire ) , modern spearhead , charlie company , charlie don't surf . |
| Grand Duke Natokina | 28 Jun 2011 12:15 p.m. PST |
Either FoF or Ambush Alley depending on your scenario. |
| Sundance | 28 Jun 2011 12:38 p.m. PST |
For tactical, modified CR3 |
| stenicplus | 28 Jun 2011 2:25 p.m. PST |
How modern? AK47 (original) for lightweight entertainment and pre 90s African wars or Cold War Commander for anything else. |
 Inari7  | 28 Jun 2011 2:50 p.m. PST |
FoF and Ambush Alley are now one rule set that I would recomend. |
| Chuckaroobob | 28 Jun 2011 8:12 p.m. PST |
I like using Iron Ivan's "Seek Out, Close With, And Destroy." It's a modification of Disposable Heroes. We use 25mm figs, usually 20-50 per side, and maybe a handful of vehicles. |
| Ianrs54 | 29 Jun 2011 5:39 a.m. PST |
Check Battle Group at the Yahoo group, for btn level. For Brigade level then CWC is good. Avoid FOW, Rapid Fire, Challemger 2000. IanS |
| Balthus | 29 Jun 2011 6:56 a.m. PST |
Personally I like "Arc of Fire" very much for tactical games up to company level games. For larger scale battles, I use Cold War Commander if it's contemporary conflicts. Balthus |
| Royal Marine | 29 Jun 2011 3:02 p.m. PST |
Cold War Commander. You cannot go wrong with set of these in a large pocket.
link … here are some nice 10mm Post WW2 figures …
link |
| Elohim | 30 Jun 2011 5:07 p.m. PST |
I'd say Force on Force for skirmish, Cold War Commander for larger actions. |
| nikharwood | 01 Jul 2011 4:28 p.m. PST |
At the risk of echo…ditto to Royal Marine & Elohim |
| 6milPhil | 07 Jul 2011 4:46 p.m. PST |
|
| Uesugi Kenshin | 07 Jul 2011 6:48 p.m. PST |
Force on Force seems pretty hard to beat currently. |
| Gennorm | 08 Jul 2011 9:02 a.m. PST |
Battlegroup for battalion-level actions. |
