Help support TMP


"Kings Of War Historical Ancient Combat supplement released." Topic


19 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board

Back to the Fantasy Discussion Message Board

Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board


1,587 hits since 2 Mar 2011
©1994-2014 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Neldoreth Inactive Member02 Mar 2011 7:25 a.m. PST

Hey all,

I figured I would post this here in case there's some interest!

As is widely known, Mantic Games is a fantasy miniatures company that is targeting the GW market. They have a fantastic little rule set that targets the WFB game. It's great, tactically deep, yet very simple and fast to pick up. It gives a great, compelling and fulfilling game. Best of all, it's absolutely free!

Naturally, someone had to create a historical supplement to make the rules work with WAB and other historical armies, and I figured I'd take a crack at it! I'd like to introduce "Kings of War Historical Ancient Combat"!

The first supplement I have done is called KoWHAC Rome Rising and it follows the late Republic around Ceasar's time, to the early Empire. As such, it includes a Roman army list that you can use to make either of the previously-mentioned lists. It also includes a list that lets you field pretty much any of Rome's barbarian or horse-type enemies!

You can get the supplement on my site in the articles section, or just download it here:

link

Thanks
n.

Personal logo Who asked this joker Supporting Member of TMP02 Mar 2011 7:46 a.m. PST

So the acronym should be KWHAC! Leave out the 'o'!grin

You can never have too many Ancients rules sets. I'll have to have a look…after I've looked at the fantasy game!

aecurtis Fezian Inactive Member02 Mar 2011 7:47 a.m. PST

"Marian Roman armies cannot field any war engines."

OK. You lost me there.

Allen

Personal logo Who asked this joker Supporting Member of TMP02 Mar 2011 9:25 a.m. PST

"Marian Roman armies cannot field any war engines."

OK. You lost me there.

Easily fixed by removing the 'not' in 'cannot' and the word 'any' in the sentence. grin

aecurtis Fezian Inactive Member02 Mar 2011 9:48 a.m. PST

The Divine Iulius would approve of that. He seemed to use them effectively. What few he had. The sixty scorpiones in each legio.

Allen

brevior est vita Inactive Member02 Mar 2011 9:51 a.m. PST

Easily fixed by removing the 'not' in 'cannot' and the word 'any' in the sentence.

Or by removing the sentence entirely.wink

KoW is not to my personal taste, but gamers looking for a very light, DBA-level version of Warhammer could find the rules quite attractive.

Personal logo Who asked this joker Supporting Member of TMP02 Mar 2011 10:43 a.m. PST

DBA-level version of Warhammer could find the system quite attractive.

Agreed.

I've noticed something. It looks like units simply stay intact but take damage. No figure removal. Did I miss something? I would have guessed that the game would lend itself well to figure removal with all of those singly based figures. The game otherwise looks well thought out.

Lists and rules look fine for KWHAC. All one person's interpretations anyway as most lists are. I would, as Allen suggests, strike the limitation of Artillery from the Marian list.

aecurtis Fezian Inactive Member02 Mar 2011 11:01 a.m. PST

I guess I don't understand shoehorning historical armies into a generic structure of "troops", "regiments", and "hordes".

Allen

Mr Elmo02 Mar 2011 11:08 a.m. PST

I guess I don't understand shoehorning historical armies into a generic structure

That would be OK as long as the army lists limited the types available.

Roman Legionnaire units would only come in regiments
Barbarians only come in Hordes except for nobles, they are troops.
Roman Auxiliary would be troops or regiments.

Personal logo Who asked this joker Supporting Member of TMP02 Mar 2011 11:14 a.m. PST

Roman Legionnaire units would only come in regiments
Barbarians only come in Hordes except for nobles, they are troops.
Roman Auxiliary would be troops or regiments.

Punic War era Romans might have Troops as there unit type for infantry.

Pike phalanx might be Regiments or Hordes.

Most others would likely be Regiments.

Light (psiloi types) troops might be Troops only.

Personal logo DColtman Supporting Member of TMP02 Mar 2011 3:26 p.m. PST

I ran an ancients modified KoW game last night using only KoW core rules, Marian Romans and Celts. I treated warbands as hordes, cohorts as regiments, and bodies of light, missile and skirmishers as troops.

- Warbands (40 figs 10 wide) are large and unwieldy to manoeuver, but can hit hard when stuck in.

- Roman regiments (15 figs 5 wide) have relatively high nerve for their unit size, elevated defence value and a pila extra strength melee attack rule.

- light troops (10 figs 5 wide) have low nerve, making them fragile, and the nimble rule making them more manouverable.

It thought it worked pretty well. It's just a model, so YMMV. But it was much more manageable to run a scenario in a 2h period than WAB. I would still prefer WAB if I had a whole afternoon.

aecurtis Fezian Inactive Member02 Mar 2011 3:40 p.m. PST

"Roman Legionnaire units would only come in regiments"

picture

or

picture

???

Allen

Neldoreth Inactive Member03 Mar 2011 8:34 a.m. PST

The troops/regiments/hordes makes sense if you think of it in terms of a) scale and b) scenario.

You could say a troop represents a cohort if you want to play it that way, or half a cohort deployed separately from its other half.

Similarly a regiment could be a cohort or a century. Finally, a horde could be a century at a 1:2 scale, or two hordes could be a century at 1:1 scale.

n.

Neldoreth Inactive Member03 Mar 2011 8:36 a.m. PST

DBA is not at all similar to KoW. DBA is a command and control game with emphasis on controlling your opponent's movement. You have to roll pips and ZOC your enemies.

Kings of War has no command and control elements really, it's much more like a simplified WAB than it is DBA. Also, the DBA rules aren't really that simple, they are filled with erroneous and fiddly little rules. That along with the fact that it's so poorly written makes it a quite complex game.

Finally, DBA doesn't support a points system or balanced armies at all and forces players to play with 12 elements/units. Kings of War on the other hand is built pretty much exactly like WAB with all of the fiddly details and special rules removed.

n.

Neldoreth Inactive Member03 Mar 2011 8:38 a.m. PST

I spend a lot of time painting figures and making them look as good as I can, so I'm very happy that they get to stay on the board as long as possible and don't get removed piecemeal.

The thing is that KoW and KoWHAC is a unit-based game. It's not based on individual figures, so that's why you live or die as a unit. This is really the only rules mechanic that KoW shares with DBA!

n.

Personal logo Who asked this joker Supporting Member of TMP03 Mar 2011 2:55 p.m. PST

It's basically a big element based game. Not a bad thing.

Neldoreth Inactive Member04 Mar 2011 10:16 a.m. PST

Yeah, it's a fun little rule set. Thanks for the feedback guys.

n.

Hobhood4 Supporting Member of TMP05 Mar 2011 8:59 a.m. PST

This looks good. I've been looking for a simple ruleset like this as I find WAB full of unecessary complications, and DBA too generic.

Any chance of Dark Age supplement?

Hobhood4 Supporting Member of TMP09 Mar 2011 3:39 a.m. PST

Neldoreth

Many thanks for posting this.As a non-fantasy player, I probably wouldn't have come across KOW otherwise.

Had a game last night using your Barbarian lists slightly altered for Dark Ages. It worked well, and is perfect for us – fast, but with lots of figures. I'm going to add a'Shield wall' special rule for next time. Maybe a unit which can move only directly forward its normal rate, and sides, rear etc. but which adds +1 to defence, unil it is disordered…? Or something like that. Thanks again.

Sorry - only trusted members can post on the forums.