""space fighters" should be aerodynamic" Topic
54 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Spaceship Gaming Message Board
Areas of InterestScience Fiction
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile Article Our Man in Southern California, Wyatt the Odd, reports on the Gamex 2005 convention.
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Pages: 1 2
| Mehoy Nehoy | 15 Mar 2010 5:50 p.m. PST |
Oh, Toaster, I so hope that was irony. |
| AdAstraGames | 19 Mar 2010 9:22 p.m. PST |
Whether space fighters should be aerodynamic depends entirely on if they're ever going to be in the atmosphere. Whether space fighters should exist at all depends more on tech assumptions and the Rule of Cool than anything else. If you ARE doing space fighters, make them look cool as minis, and try to make them scale compatible with other stuff I publish, like the upcoming BoP minis. |
| KTravlos | 20 Mar 2010 8:20 a.m. PST |
space fighters shouldn't exist;) |
| Lion in the Stars | 05 Apr 2010 3:47 p.m. PST |
@AdAstra: what rough scale? 1:3900? I'm debating building the Jovian Chronicles 'MacLeod Program' ships in 1:3900 and sending them to shapeways (after getting DP9's approval), but those ships are *BIG* (2.85" dia centrifuge and about 3-5" long) in that scale. Half the JC ships have obvious small-craft catapults, so fighters are necessary! |
Pages: 1 2
|
