Help support TMP


"Damage to a ship's stack" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ironclads (1862-1889) Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War
19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

1:72nd ACW Infantry: On Parade

Celebrating another milestone with my Union army.


Featured Profile Article

Music Video: Lightning Bolt

A music video about Diaz's charge at Puebla.


1,455 hits since 27 Feb 2010
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
gert174627 Feb 2010 4:17 p.m. PST

In using a rule where the damage to a stack causes the ship's speed to be reduced in half, would vessels with double stacks have to have each stack damaged to receive the same result?

Thanks in advance,
Gert

Sundance27 Feb 2010 4:53 p.m. PST

Good question. I use Under Both Flags and I think there, there's only one factor for stacks regardless of how many stacks the ship has. In that way, only the collective damage matters – not the individual damage to each stack.

Personal logo Virtualscratchbuilder Supporting Member of TMP Fezian27 Feb 2010 5:19 p.m. PST

I would go with "stacks" generically rather than try to account for multiple stacks. Think of it this way…. you have one fat stack that carries all the draft, or two thinner ones that each carry half. One hit halves a fat stack, or knocks down a thin stack.

gert174627 Feb 2010 7:18 p.m. PST

That sounds good to me- thank you.

would the smoke from a damaged stack fill the casemate of an enclosed Ironclad?

Personal logo gamertom Supporting Member of TMP27 Feb 2010 7:25 p.m. PST

Those tall thin stacks were a means of enhancing natural air circulation for the fires used to heat the boilers. Hot air rises and creates a slight vacuum beneath it. This vacuum draws air in. Until blower fans were invented and installed to force air into furnaces, you needed a good strong draft to maintain a good hot fire (during the ACW wood was used as fuel). The long thin stacks gave a good path for the hot air from the furnace to raise and the height of the stack increased the strength of the draft created. If a stack were pierced or shot through, the draft was reduced and the fire would not burn as evenly or as hotly. Thus you would loose speed as the steam production decreased. An excellent example of this was the speed reduction caused by multiple stack hits on the CSS Arkansas during its infamous run through the Union Mississippi River fleet from the mouth of the Yazoo River to Vicksburg, Mississippi. Towards the end it barely had enough headway to steer it to the landing rather than just drifting with the river current.

Personal logo gamertom Supporting Member of TMP27 Feb 2010 7:29 p.m. PST

You would have to have a round penetrate the casemate and then the feeder trunk for the stack in order to have a large amount of smoke enter the casemate from a stack hit. Otherwise the smoke raises to the hole made in the stack above the casemate (rather than the top of the stack and this lowers the draft created through the furnace)

gert174627 Feb 2010 7:47 p.m. PST

Thanks Gamertom

I appreciate the explanation

doc mcb28 Feb 2010 3:33 p.m. PST

Why "infamous" versus "famous"? The ARKANSAS saga was one of the great feats of arms during the entire war.

Personal logo gamertom Supporting Member of TMP28 Feb 2010 8:17 p.m. PST

doc mcb – My bad! "Famous" is the proper term. I quite agree with your assessment of the Arkansas saga. The Arkansas' trip down the Yazoo River fighting three Union ships and then run through the Union river fleet to reach Vicksburg is truly epic. And it was conducted with gun crews who largely were Missouri cavalry given the rudiments of handling artillery and then were returned to their regiment after Vicksburg was reached.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.