Help support TMP


"15mm in fractional scale?" Topic


20 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the SF Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Warriors of Mars


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Dead Alien Fields

The fourth and final alien field.


Featured Profile Article

Report from ReaperCon 2006

Michael Cannon reports from last May's ReaperCon 2006.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


2,935 hits since 19 Nov 2009
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

TheDreadnought19 Nov 2009 9:28 p.m. PST

So what does 15mm scale translate to when you're talking fractional scales? 1/144??

CPBelt19 Nov 2009 9:38 p.m. PST

Depends if you want to get into the metaphysical discussion of what really is 15mm? Sometimes around 1/100 give or take. 1/144 is more 10mm-ish.

Cpt Arexu19 Nov 2009 9:52 p.m. PST

1/100

Top Gun Ace19 Nov 2009 10:27 p.m. PST

1/144th is 12mm.

1/120th is 15mm, assuming you mean to the top of the figure, and using 1800mm tall males as the standard.

Since most 15mm (measured to the eyes) are really about 18mm in height, from top of head to the soles of their feet, 1/100th seems to be the accepted norm by many people.

Cacique Caribe19 Nov 2009 10:40 p.m. PST

I'm still new to 15mm, but I find that, when it comes to terrain bits, some of the taller 15mm figures look great next to 1/87 (HO scale) vehicles, brick walls and other pieces.

Dan

GypsyComet19 Nov 2009 10:46 p.m. PST

An 18mm tall figure is 1/100 for someone 5'11" tall, which is not unusual. The other common measure (no arguments as to "rightness" please) is to the figure's eyes, and 15mm to the eyes would represent a 1/100th someone who was about 5'5" if realistically proportioned. 15mm to the top of head scales to 4'11".

So yes, the variability around 15mm figures works just fine as 1/100. Historical vehicles made for "15mm" are typically 1/100, and should measure as such, with some allowance made for mold shrinkage.

MPDeputy19 Nov 2009 11:02 p.m. PST

Also 15mm goes with TT Train scale (1/120).

Personal logo Dye4minis Supporting Member of TMP19 Nov 2009 11:28 p.m. PST

Top Gun Ace has it right! Six feet of measurement is 1800mm. When you divide 15 into 1800 you get 120 (the denominator of the fractional scale). Works the same in reverse.

18mm= 1/100th. You must decide which mm size your figures and vehicles are. (15 or 18mm)

The math doesn't lie! 8>)

Best
Tom Dye
GFI

Personal logo Doms Decals Sponsoring Member of TMP20 Nov 2009 3:43 a.m. PST

Except of course that average height varies by nationality and era – for most periods 6 feet would be very tall, not typical. (For a WW2 GI, 5'6" is generally quoted, which would give you 1/112 for a figure exactly 15mm high; a 17mm figure would be pretty much 1/100.) With all that said, most "15mm" equipment is sculpted at 1/100, with only a couple of older ranges at 1/108, at least for 20th century stuff.

Martin Rapier20 Nov 2009 5:08 a.m. PST

What Dom said, 1/100th (in general, although I do use some 1/87th scale stuff too).

TheDreadnought20 Nov 2009 7:35 a.m. PST

LOL! Thanks guys! Only on TMP would I be able to get more than one response to this question!

Black Cavalier20 Nov 2009 8:20 a.m. PST

Check out this nifty scale reference page on the old TMP site
TMP link

I use it all the time.

Cacique Caribe20 Nov 2009 8:33 a.m. PST

This is cool too:

TMP link
TMP link

Dan

Farstar20 Nov 2009 12:25 p.m. PST

Steve says:

DELETED

Yeah, this topic can leave me speechless, too.

infojunky20 Nov 2009 1:22 p.m. PST

Historically 15mm was the average size of the figures that worked well with 1:100th identification models.

And in General a wide number of "Scales" tend to work, it really comes down to; Does it look right.

Lentulus22 Nov 2009 5:22 p.m. PST

15mm being what it is, it is somewhat open to interpretation. I took a set of calipers to my outpost miniatures FPW french and found that at 1:100 the Chassepot rifle he carries is exactly the right length, and estimating the top of his head inside the kepi he was pretty much the average height of French soldiers for 1870.

This will probably not work for every line. People vary, but measuring standardized kit should get at the sculptor's intent for scale.

28mmMan22 Nov 2009 7:13 p.m. PST

2 cents worth : the bulk of miniatures are made to a size not to a scale

That said, there is a fine margin for in and out of scale when your standard is only 15-18mm in total height…1mm is close to 4-5" in scale and it makes a huge difference in 1:4 or 1:5, huge.

As there will never ever be a constant standard then it only makes sense to use the term size rather than scale.

What is the fractal of 15mm? It can only be answered by measuring and calculating a particular miniature, IMO.

Cacique Caribe27 Jan 2011 4:00 a.m. PST

Guys,

I could help but add this quick note . . .

I have finally found ABSOLUTE PROOF that 15mmm figures are really 1/100 scale:

YouTube link
YouTube link
picture

Even though she's shown in heels, she is really 1.52m tall. Pretty close to 1/100, if you ask me. And, I think, she's totally proportional. :)

Dan
TMP link

Cacique Caribe27 Jan 2011 4:35 a.m. PST

Seriously though, I do look at 18mm as being a representation of a 6 foot (1.8m) tall man, measured the way we all measure ourselves, from heel to top of head.

Which means that 3mm equals a foot.

So, to me, 18mm represents 1.8m. That's 1/100 in my book.

Dan
link

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.