
"FOW Modern?" Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2015) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article Two of Hasslefree's Adventurers venture to Serbia...
Featured Profile Article Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.
|
| Soldat | 16 Nov 2009 3:45 p.m. PST |
With the psuedo supplement for FOW NAM coming out in the next WI, it should be a breeze to work out GFW1 GFW2 stats. |
| CPT Jake | 16 Nov 2009 3:46 p.m. PST |
Not sure why you need to wait for the Vietnam rules to do that. |
| darthfozzywig | 16 Nov 2009 5:53 p.m. PST |
They've all been deployed. |
| dwight shrute | 17 Nov 2009 8:38 a.m. PST |
|
| Soldat | 17 Nov 2009 5:07 p.m. PST |
Thanks for the input and the website. |
| Crazycaptain56 | 18 Nov 2009 10:27 a.m. PST |
Sadly a lot of it is dead. The site has some good ideas and trends. I recently required a massive amount of micro armor and did a really quick play through of U.S.S.R Russian Tank attack VS U.S Tank. The tanks do not play to well. Its almost impossible for the Russians to even BAIL the U.S Armor from the front. But otherwise, with work I believe it would be incredibly fun and could allow for some MASSIVE battles due to the simplicity of the rules. A few of my friends and I have thought about keeping the armor values to a maximum at 6 and the AT probably around 10 at max. The Guys on the Modern site have the armor and AT way up in the double digits so it creates a sort of tight rope. |
| Chuckaroobob | 18 Nov 2009 10:14 p.m. PST |
We've played a few games of US vs. USSR and I agree, it's a nearly imposible game for the Soviets, M1's are incrediably tough. |
|