
"French cavalry at Maida" Topic
10 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| vtsaogames | 12 Nov 2009 4:53 p.m. PST |
I'm waiting for my copy of Black Powder to cross the pond. Maida seems like the perfect size battle for these rules. But I do wonder how many cavalry the French had at Maida. Some sources say 300 – 3 squadrons and others say 128 – one squadron. If cavalry are powerful in these rules it makes a big difference. I used to play the WRG 1750-1850 rules back in the day. Napoleonic infantry had to form square when facing cavalry, which made them very powerful. The French romped over the Brits twice this way. Once a new player didn't use his cavalry and got thumped by the redcoats. But back to my original request: anyone know how many Chasseurs a Cheval were in Reynier's command? |
| Prince Alberts Revenge | 12 Nov 2009 5:07 p.m. PST |
I was under the impression that it was 3 squadrons of Chasseurs e Cheval. Unfortunately all of my sources are packed up for a move. Pink facings for them as I recall
|
BTCTerrainman  | 12 Nov 2009 5:56 p.m. PST |
Hopton's "The Battle of Maida" lists the cavalry force as 300 men. Doug |
| Widowson | 12 Nov 2009 5:58 p.m. PST |
Based on rules I've seen dealing with the Peninsula, it makes little difference. All French cav is rated crap, and all Brit cav is rated like guard. Maybe that was the reality. Do I sound bitter? |
| napoleon books | 12 Nov 2009 6:06 p.m. PST |
Dear All, 300 troopers (a suspiciously round number but surely directionally correct) of the 9th Regiment present at the battle. Little did I know that when my very first contribution to Napoleonic literature was published, "A Reappraisal of Column Versus Line in the Napoleonic Wars" (Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research, 1982), that Maida would continue to be a subject of interest. This article launched my Napoleonic book career but on the gaming front proved problematic. I introduced "Generalship Napoleonics" and put on a re-fight of Maida at a convention in Chester, PA (a precursor to today's various HMGS cons.) The little French battery (commanded by Grios, oh how I thrilled when I was the first to find and cite his Memoirs!) fired its four-pound shot and hit Kempt's Light Infantry. Morale test required, 90% chance of passing. The poor player failed. In shock all around, on to the Panic Table
anything but a one on a six sided die and the light bobs would stay on the table. The roll: a one. Maybe that is why today, when I re-enter the wargaming publishing arena, I stick to historical scenarios and Battles for Empire rather than publish rules. Enjoy your game. James Arnold Napoleon Books. |
| Defiant | 12 Nov 2009 6:14 p.m. PST |
The Battle of Maida 1806 – Fifteen minutes of glory Richard Hopton 2002 ISBN – 0 85052 845 3 Pen & Sword page 111 : "There seems to be no dispute that Regnier had 300 cavalry from the 9th Chasseurs at his disposal". 3 squadrons Incidentally, my friend and I played this battle out several years ago with exact orbats, terrain layout and deployments using my own system which is down to btln/company level. The astonishing thing was that the overall progress of the battle and eventual outcome was almost identical to the real battle. And what was more interesting was that the battle took three hours to play-out. Regards Shane |
| vtsaogames | 12 Nov 2009 7:07 p.m. PST |
James, when I first started playing Maida I assumed the French had come on in columns. But it was an easy battle to put on the table. |
| napoleon books | 12 Nov 2009 8:21 p.m. PST |
Dear VTAOSGAMES, I first met David Chandler after my article on Maida appeared. I had written "even David Chandler had it wrong" about the French columns. He cheerfully explained, with tortured logic, that the French arrived on the field in column and that therefore he was right, but, maybe, this young fellow named Arnold, also had it right; they then deployed in line. It was the start of a life long friendship. James |
| Connard Sage | 13 Nov 2009 12:54 a.m. PST |
Based on rules I've seen dealing with the Peninsula, it makes little difference. All French cav is rated crap, and all Brit cav is rated like guard. Maybe that was the reality.Do I sound bitter? You sound ill informed. Maida was in Italy. Still is :) |
| M C MonkeyDew | 13 Nov 2009 6:25 a.m. PST |
Maida makes for a great game. If you stick to history and have each brigade engage in turn it usually ends mimicking history. If you allow the players the same forces and have the fight on the same field, its fairly well balanced. If you allow the French to stay in their camp instead of advance to meet the British it favors the French but is hardly then a historical scenario.
And there a Swiss on both sides! |
|