
"DBMM Report Card - All Results Now Online" Topic
2 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Blogs of War Message Board
Action Log
08 Jan 2017 2:25 p.m. PST by Editor in Chief Bill
- Removed from Medieval Product Reviews board
- Removed from Ancients Product Reviews board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Current Poll
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| vexillia | 24 Aug 2009 3:15 p.m. PST |
|
timurilank  | 25 Aug 2009 1:37 a.m. PST |
Martin, Excellent survey. On the whole, I found the reponses not much different from those made about previous rule books and my experience with WRG dates back to the 2nd edition Ancients (10mm frontage for SHI). Unfortunately, my intrest in Ancients took a back seat three years ago when I chose for a total immersion of the SYW period. After a half year search for a suitable set of rules, we dusted off our copies of the WRG 1685 – 1845 rule book (1979) and gave them a test. Phil does write in a concise manner and for many readers his style will evoke many questions. He does answer questions sent directly to him, but I have not known him to participate in forums, he is simply too busy developing games. I loved his corps level game, the Battle of Dorking (British vs. Germans), never released. After reading your survey, I would certainly play DBMM and give the later medieval period a try. Cheers, Robert 18thcenturysojourn.blogspot.com |
|