Help support TMP


""Turtle Ship" Rules" Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Renaissance Discussion Message Board

Back to the Classical Asian Warfare Message Board

Back to the Galleys Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients
Medieval
Renaissance

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Roads

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian takes a look at flexible roads made from long-lasting flexible resin.


1,288 hits since 30 May 2009
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

David Manley30 May 2009 12:24 p.m. PST

An update – after the chat earlier this month regarding 1/800 models of Korean and Japanese naval vessels I've started work on a couple of sets of rules. One is aimed at fleet actions, the second at ship to ship actions. Both are in the "fast play" mold, and are based on previous sets of Ancient and Renaissance rules that I've used before with some success. This will be aslow project to complete as I don't have much time to devote to it at the momet, but I hope to have the first workable draft out in a week or two.

Personal logo Miniatureships Sponsoring Member of TMP30 May 2009 3:23 p.m. PST

David, I have a few questions about rules for Turtle Ships. Basically, were not all other ships rather useless against Turtle Ships? Would not any set of rules dealing with Turtle ships have really favour them over any other ship? Second, how would one be able to board a turtle ship?

I quess I am just curious, because from my understanding is that if would be a very one sided game if done from the historical point.

Uesugi Kenshin Supporting Member of TMP30 May 2009 4:10 p.m. PST

Admiral Yi lost at least 1 Turtle ship against the japanese. They could be holed by artillery fire or set fire by flaming arrows.

They have an opening on the rear of the ship that makes boarding possible, though difficult.

Admiral Yi also never had more than about 4 Turtle ships present in any one battle at a time where there were 100's of other ships present.

So they were indeed a force to be reckoned with, but only available in tiny numbers. The Panokseons (Battleships) were the real workhorses of the Korean Navy.

David Manley30 May 2009 10:10 p.m. PST

Couldn't have put it better myself :)

Klebert L Hall31 May 2009 7:10 a.m. PST

Basically, were not all other ships rather useless against Turtle Ships?

If they had been as dominant as that, similar designs would have become the mainstay of naval forces in the region for quite some time. It doesn't seem to have happened, so they must've had some weaknesses.
-Kle.

Big Martin01 Jun 2009 5:04 a.m. PST

As Uesugi Kenshin says, their main weakness is that there were never enough of them to totally dominate.

nycjadie01 Jun 2009 11:11 a.m. PST

They must have been extremely costly to build. The amount of iron used to create the upper deck must have been very heavy as well.

Uesugi Kenshin Supporting Member of TMP01 Jun 2009 2:20 p.m. PST

Indeed, in Admiral Yi's memorials to the Korean Court he often mentions sending a gift of iron to various generals to, ostensibly be used in weapon manufacturing. It was obviously a highly prized commodity.

CorpCommander05 Jun 2009 1:29 p.m. PST

I am really looking forward to this!

Uesugi Kenshin Supporting Member of TMP05 Jun 2009 4:00 p.m. PST

Me too!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.