Help support TMP


"charles vs hiller" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

De Bellis Antiquitatis (DBA)


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

2 Elves for Flintloque

I paint the last two figures from the Escape from the Dark Czar starter set.


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article

Dung Gate

For the time being, the last in our series of articles on the gates of Old Jerusalem.


Current Poll


381 hits since 12 May 2008
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
weissenwolf12 May 2008 7:56 a.m. PST

what was the problem between the archduke and freiherr hiller? i tend to side with charles after reading hiller going behind charles back to the kaiser.

Knight Templar12 May 2008 9:05 a.m. PST

Hiller was an early version evolving eventually into Hitler. He was in a fairly embryonic stage in this period. There are those (though I do not agree with them) who believe that the next incarnation is already identified as Ahmadinejad: see the connection?

Knight Templar12 May 2008 9:09 a.m. PST

Simply, though, it was a conflict of two personalities at opposite ends: revisionist (modernist) and conservative, Charles and Hiller.

anleiher12 May 2008 10:28 a.m. PST

From what I have read, Hiller was an adept at playing the political game. The emperor was concerned with Charles' rising popularity in the army and this coupled with the innately conservative nature of the Vienna court caused the HK to constantly try to hamstring Charles' ambitions.

Hiller was also not the general he thought himself to be. Ultimately, he would be sacked for his poor performance in the Italian campaign in 1813-14.

All in all a noxious mix of personal vanity (Hiller), jealousy (the Emperor), and a conservative court came together to limit what Charles might have otherwise been able to bring about.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.