Help support TMP


"Difference between a DC-3 and C-47" Topic


19 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2015) Message Board

Back to the WWII Aviation Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two in the Air
Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Victory as a Campaign System

Can a WWII blockgame find happiness as a miniatures campaign system?


Featured Workbench Article

Assembling & Painting GFI's N-Scale Hurricanes

miscmini Fezian assembles and paints two varieties of Hurricanes from Game Figures, Inc..


Featured Profile Article

First Look: GF9's 15mm Falaise House

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian explores another variant in the European Buildings range.


Featured Book Review


2,490 hits since 6 May 2008
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Windward06 May 2008 8:42 a.m. PST

Does anyone know, if the military C-47s carried armor, self-sealing fuel tanks or any harding over say a standard DC-3?

I'm doing some research on the Football War, and wondered if the late war production C-47s where tougher than say an early war DC-3.

Personal logo Saber6 Supporting Member of TMP Fezian06 May 2008 9:15 a.m. PST

Color of paint?

jpattern206 May 2008 10:06 a.m. PST

Tougher, no, not really. The DC-3/C-47 was (is) an inherently rugged airframe, though.

IIRC, fewer than 500 DC-3s were built prior to WWII, while more than 10,000 C-47s of various types were built during and after the war. Most post-war DC-3s were actually de-militarized C-47s.

The C-47 differed from the DC-3 primarily in having a large cargo door and a reinforced floor. They did have self-sealing fuel tanks, but I've never heard of armor being fitted to any C-47.

Wiki links: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DC-3 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-47

Wyatt the Odd Fezian06 May 2008 10:08 a.m. PST

According to Osprey's Combat Aircraft "C-47/R4D Units of the ETO & MTO" most C-47's did not have self-sealing fuel tanks.

Some later C-47's & C-53's came with self-sealing tanks.

Individual crews added armor to the cockpit area but it wasn't standard by any means.

Wyatt

jpattern206 May 2008 10:15 a.m. PST

Forgot to add, I've read many references to DC-3s being used in the Football War, but in every case they were actually de-militarized C-47s of one type or another. One Salvadoran C-47A ex-USAF Skytrain was converted into a "bomber" of sorts, with 100-pound bombs rolled through a hole cut in the lower fuselage: link

Wyatt the Odd Fezian06 May 2008 10:27 a.m. PST

I found the reference. On page 49 in the above-mentioned book, it says:

…A proposal to fit IX TCC (Troop Carrier Command) aircraft with self-sealing tanks and armor was turned down by 'Hap' Arnold. Only 75 C-47's had been delivered with them in 1942-43 before the weight penalty was considered excessive. Crews were instead authorized body armor and seat pads."

Wyatt

jpattern206 May 2008 11:17 a.m. PST

I thought more than that had self-sealing tanks, but there you go.

DontFearDareaper Fezian06 May 2008 11:32 a.m. PST

I guess ol Hap figured that self-sealing tanks weren't going to help the poor C-47 crew if they wound up in the sights of an enemy fighter. grin

Dave

Windward06 May 2008 11:38 a.m. PST

Sadly, looks like Check Your 6! robustness of 2 is correct. If they where not armored Making a C-47 roughly as tough as a standard fighter. While something like a B-25 would have a robustness of 3.

Jay Arnold06 May 2008 11:41 a.m. PST

Of course, the passengers don't like putting down their gin and tonics to man the guns, either:

picture

Windward06 May 2008 11:44 a.m. PST

The C-47s of the Football War where all former US Navy and USAF planes. So I was hoping the military versions where somehow tougher.

Windward06 May 2008 11:46 a.m. PST

Historically a FAS C-47 shook off a number of gun runs by a FAH F4U-4 (armed with 6 .50 cals). It was badly shot up but limped across the border and made it back to base. Never to fly again.

Sir James06 May 2008 4:24 p.m. PST

D-44?

Sorry, couldn't resist.

Now you're talking about the C-47 "bomber" from Football Wars, right? If you see him, ask the author about the "wimpy" AA fire from his play-test. :)

Corsair07 May 2008 3:33 a.m. PST

The big difference between a DC-3 and a C-47 was the doors. The DC-3 (and a few military variants like the C-53 Skytooper) had passenger doors in the aft starboard fuselage, while the C-47 had the large double doors in the port aft fuselage. Also a lot of the C-47s had plugs in the passenger windows so that embarked troops could poke a rifle barrel out and take potshots at enemy aircraft. The C-47 in WWII also had a glider tow cleat at the end of the tail.
The tricky part is for those C-47s snapped up as surplus after the war. Many of them had rebuilds for civilian use ( we have one here locally that was such an airframe). They would receive the airliner type doors in place of the military ones.
Corsair

Windward07 May 2008 1:46 p.m. PST

Now don't be mean Jim. I was running for my life…

OGUKman08 May 2008 6:16 a.m. PST

Having just released a C47 in 15mm AND having a passing interest in the Football War this unusual post caught my eye. Way out of my usual Balliwick. Now all I need is to remember the url of the website I found detailing the Football Air war Colur schemes the lot and I lost it !!!

jpattern208 May 2008 7:59 a.m. PST

The Air Combat Information Group has a nice page with many of the aircraft schemes: link

Good shot of the C-47A here: link

Windward08 May 2008 8:33 a.m. PST

The actual colors of the Salvadorian C-47s during the Football War (or as locally referred to as "The Hundred Hours War") where a civilian white over blue over bare metal.

link

Has some nice photos of the historic colors.

You will note the C-47s still have their cargo doors (all the better for pushing bombs out of!) :P

FWIW, the LAAHS is an excellent source of info on the Football War, and details about the FAS and FAH forces.

OGUKman09 May 2008 1:48 a.m. PST

Thats the one- thanks Windward.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.