Help support TMP


"GW forgets some daemons?" Topic


18 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Fantasy Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Fantasy

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Another Dwarven Army for Mighty Armies

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian replaces his Dwarf army… sort of.


Featured Profile Article

Making a Pond with Realistic Water

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian builds a pond for his campaign.


Current Poll


Featured Movie Review


997 hits since 6 May 2008
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
streetline06 May 2008 3:53 a.m. PST

OK… so the fact that GW are about to tinker with Chaos again got discussed a little here… TMP link but now it's closer to the release, there's more detail on the site.

No mounted daemonettes. Anywhere. Gone from the store, no mention of them in the new stuff. The figures have been around for 4 years or more and didn't need to be redone.

So a mistake, or deliberate ommission?

x42brown06 May 2008 4:50 a.m. PST

Still in the book as Seekers of Slaanesh. So I expect they'll be about some time.

x42

Pat Ripley Fezian06 May 2008 5:05 a.m. PST

were the older figures a bit too lurid perhaps?

streetline06 May 2008 5:41 a.m. PST

x42brown, that's good news – thanks…

blackscribe06 May 2008 7:10 a.m. PST

They *always* seem to forget some demon or another.

EagleSixFive06 May 2008 7:11 a.m. PST

"were the older figures a bit too lurid perhaps?"

Probably are now with a marketing strategy aimed at eight year olds.

streetline06 May 2008 7:37 a.m. PST

I'm not sure they were more lurid. More pert, yes.

aka Mikefoster06 May 2008 8:27 a.m. PST

Yet another reason why I have stopped playing 40k.(The mounted Deamonettes gone that is).

M C MonkeyDew06 May 2008 10:47 a.m. PST

Chaos should be the most frequently changed army : )

Personal logo Silurian Supporting Member of TMP06 May 2008 11:53 a.m. PST

So how many versions of Daemonettes are there now? 3 or 4?

x42brown06 May 2008 12:11 p.m. PST

The foot ones I'm gluing up just now only have one boob and don't compare at all favourable with my older ones. All crab claws and heads that don't fit well. I think they have stopped doing the old mounted ones as they had hands and the new fluff has all the daemonettes as clawed.

x42

Ron W DuBray06 May 2008 2:43 p.m. PST

just GW's way to try to make their fans to spend more money and to stop long time players from using their old minis. they have been doing this since 3ed ED

Farstar06 May 2008 3:05 p.m. PST

"So how many versions of Daemonettes are there now? 3 or 4?"

The plastics make the fourth full generation for both the Daemonettes and the Bloodletters. There was a partial revision in the second generation for all four lesser daemon types, but it boils down to 3rd edition, 4th/5th, 6th, and now 7th edition releases.

For the Daemonettes these are the skinny bondage hybrids, the burly crab "girls" in bikinis, the nekkid waifs with knives, and the new plastics.

For the Bloodletters the generations are the snake-like blade-lickers, the musclebound, the slightly less-ripped but more animated, and the new almost-snakey plastics.

Horrors and Plaguebearers have not seen a fourth generation yet, though the Horrors "partial" update in the second generation was more significant than the other three got, IIRC, while the Plaguebearers are really hard to tell apart in their first two generations aside from decreasing variety.

Personal logo Silurian Supporting Member of TMP06 May 2008 3:34 p.m. PST

Thanks for that Farstar. Now I can tell what I have and haven't got.

Farstar06 May 2008 4:16 p.m. PST

Daemonic attribute differences and the more-than-occasional "loose boob" aside, the 1st generation Daemonettes are also rather primitive in sculpting technique compared to later generations.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.