
"D20s numbered 0-9" Topic
9 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Dice Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Profile Article Looking for some inexpensive wooden bases?
|
| Woolshed Wargamer | 02 May 2008 5:20 p.m. PST |
Where can I get some? Any help would be nice. |
Mserafin  | 02 May 2008 5:25 p.m. PST |
I might have some. How many do you need, and do you just want two series of 0-9, or do you want them different colors so you can distinguish digits from tens? |
| Saxondog | 02 May 2008 10:43 p.m. PST |
When I started playing DND eons ago, that was the only d20 to be found. Therefore it stands to reason that some are still to be found. Google is your friend. I found this one in about 4 seconds. link Others are sure to be out there. Having issues with the link
address is still correct.
|
| Doug em4miniatures | 03 May 2008 12:09 p.m. PST |
We've got 'em: link Scroll down. Doug |
| Martin Rapier | 03 May 2008 1:02 p.m. PST |
Like Saxondog, all mine are like that. Pre-dated D&D, I had a very dodgy set of micro armour rules which required percetnage dice rolls for combat resolution. All tanks and no infantry! |
| pigbear | 06 May 2008 3:12 a.m. PST |
What is the purpose of these dice? I would assume that the older versions were made for reasons of convenience. Whay make a whole new shape (D10) if you can modify something you already produce? But why bother seeking them out now or am I missing something? |
| Kevin Cook | 06 May 2008 8:04 a.m. PST |
They were the original style of D20's that were used as D10's, D20's (color 1 of each # then call which is high)
and D100's (percentile) I still use this type of die for percentile and D10 rolls
but I used a 1-20 d20 for d20's
as there will be no confusion as to which #'s are high |
| pigbear | 06 May 2008 4:14 p.m. PST |
That explains it. Come to think of it, I do recall seeing them many moons ago. |
|