Help support TMP


"AH WAS / VITP / 9 Navies Design factors..?" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Naval Gaming 1898-1929 Message Board

Back to the Game Design Message Board

Back to the WWII Naval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
19th Century
World War One
World War Two at Sea

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

The Sword and the Flame


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Profile Article

Editor Gwen's 2nd Wargaming Video

Personal logo Editor Gwen The Editor of TMP returns to make another successful wargaming video.


Featured Book Review


445 hits since 29 Apr 2008
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

terrain sherlock29 Apr 2008 1:22 p.m. PST

Is anyone aware of how the ships in the old Avalon Hill War At Sea and Victory in the Pacific ships values were arrrived at.>? Or the values in Niine Navies War..?

I'm looking to do teh Russo-Japanese War and the Spannish-American war..

Thanks in advance..:-)

zippyfusenet29 Apr 2008 7:14 p.m. PST

In The General Vol 14 #4 was published designer Richard Hamblen's article "Victory in the Pacific – Nuts, Bolts, Philosophy and Design". Hamblen gave several formulae for ship counter design:

Gun Factor
6 9 X 18.1" guns
5 8 or 9 16" guns
4 8 or more 14" or 15" guns
3 6 X 15", 9 to 12 X 12" or 9 X 11" guns
2 6 X 11" guns
1 8" guns and special cases (lesser guns, torpedos)

"The attack bonus was given to ships to reflect unusual accuracy in their surface combat."


Armor Factor
(Old BB) (New BB) (BC)
9 – over 50k -
6 – 45k -
5 40k 35k -
4 30k 27k 45k
3 24k 35k 35k
2 *** 15k including heavy cruisers ***

"Otherwise, armor factors are based on complicated comparisons of armor weight and placement, ship weight and design, damage control practices…"


Speed Factor
8 34.5 knots
7 32.5 knots
6 30 knots
5 27.5 knots
4 25 knots
3 21 knots

In The General Vol 17 #6 was published an article "In Defense of Historical Verity or Pooh On You, Too" by Jim Davis. Davis pointed out that a number of ships in WAS and VITP and in associated game variants had been rated inconsistently with these formulae. Davis corrected the ratings for those ships.

Bardolph29 Apr 2008 7:16 p.m. PST

I think I have a General article that discusses that, I'll see if I can find it. You might also check over at the BoardGameGeek entries for those games.

Bardolph29 Apr 2008 7:16 p.m. PST

Whoops, I type too slow.

terrain sherlock29 Apr 2008 10:18 p.m. PST

zippyfusenet.. youse a scholar anna gennulmuns..

Many thanks..!!

Jim

SeattleGamer Supporting Member of TMP05 May 2008 9:40 p.m. PST

There were a BUNCH of AH General Magazine articles for War at Sea, including:

Vol 13/#3 which added variant counters for the Med,
Vol 14/#3 which added the French navy,
Vol 15/#3 which added the Russian navy,

And according to my AH General Index of articles, there were several other articles that added optional rules, and these included other counters as well. The article names do not invoke what sort of counters, but the entry then states V + C which means variant rules + counters.

Volumes that include that sort of entry include:

Vol 14/#4 Victory at Sea
Vol 15/#6 Realistic Victory at Sea

Finally, there is an issue with an article titled The SHips of War at Sea (Vol 16/#3. Wonder if that is a rundown of all the various ships, or just a brief history article.

I have most of these issues (everything from Vol 14/3 until they closed up shop with Vol 32/3). I could pull them if that would help. But if all you wanted was the formula, I think you have that already.

Pity I only just now realized that there were variant counters to WAS in Vol 11/3. I probably would have made an effort to track down Vol 13 back in the day to get them. WAS was/remains a very fun game.

Steve

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.