Help support TMP


"Saber rattling at 5000 feet" Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2015) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

The 4' x 6' Assault Table Top

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian begins to think about terrain for Team Yankee.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: GF9's 15mm Dresden House

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian examines another house in this series.


Featured Movie Review


454 hits since 16 Apr 2008
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Cke1st16 Apr 2008 7:19 a.m. PST

Iran is putting on their version of an air show: link

I like how they aim "to reveal the power of the Iranian armed forces to defend their homeland," and pad their numbers with civilian passenger planes.

Mathion16 Apr 2008 7:26 a.m. PST

The plane looks like an F-5, not an F-4.

EagleSixFive16 Apr 2008 7:45 a.m. PST

Tis 'cause it is an F5. Typical media for ya.

Personal logo Doms Decals Sponsoring Member of TMP16 Apr 2008 7:58 a.m. PST

Yep – that's an F-5 alright. To be fair on the "passenger planes" I suspect they're IIAF not civilian – 707s are certainly used as tankers, and I'd not be surprised if the 747s are too.

Cke1st16 Apr 2008 8:11 a.m. PST

Does Iran have the wherewithal to convert a passenger plane into a tanker? Judging by the brouhaha the USAF is experiencing in its quest for new tankers, it's not an easy thing to do.

Another possibility: can a passenger liner be used for parachute drops of supplies or (if Iran has them) paratroopers?

Still, I wouldn't jump to too many conclusions, lest I be misled by the author's great knowledge of "aircrafts."

Personal logo Doms Decals Sponsoring Member of TMP16 Apr 2008 8:22 a.m. PST

They were bought fitted as tankers back in the 70s, so conversion not necessary. I can't be arsed to check numbers, but there were a dozen or so 707s and maybe 5 Jumbos bought, including several fitted with booms to support the F-4 fleet. Given the parts availability, their servicability ought to be much higher than the fighters bought back then.

As for the USAF brouhaha, I think that's politics rather than technical know-how; both Boeing and Airbus are perfectly capable of producing decent tankers, even if the Airbus one does look the better of the two….

As for paras, theoretically yes, but it's not overly safe, and you'll end up with very long sticks; better using the C-130 any day….

Dom.

Darby E16 Apr 2008 8:35 a.m. PST

Well, if someone were quick enough, they could bag the whole IIAF at one time.

wminsing16 Apr 2008 8:43 a.m. PST

Well, if someone were quick enough, they could bag the whole IIAF at one time.

That was my first thought as well. Seems pretty risky to put every bird into the air just for show.

-Will

Personal logo Doms Decals Sponsoring Member of TMP16 Apr 2008 8:47 a.m. PST

Hmm, there's a scenario…. Heck, I even have a handful of Pit Road 1/700 Raptors as well as a modest 1/600 IIAF….

Top Gun Ace16 Apr 2008 4:23 p.m. PST

Using runway cratering ordnance while they are in the air should help to make life a bit more difficult for those that elude any hunters….

That way, maybe some of the ex-Iraqi jets might return to their original owners.

Mark Wals16 Apr 2008 10:07 p.m. PST

There was a short air campaign over the Bekaa Valley in Lebanon in the late 80's between Syria and Israel. The Israelis shot down about 300 planes to no losses I seeem to recall. I doubt Iran could manage much better today.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.