Help support TMP


"Squares..." Topic


17 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Wargaming in the United Kingdom Message Board

Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board

Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board

Back to the 18th Century Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
18th Century
Napoleonic
American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

On To Richmond


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

GallopingJack Checks Out The Terrain Mat

Mal Wright Fezian goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.


Featured Profile Article

Other Games at Council of Five Nations 2011

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian snapped some photos of games he didn't get a chance to play in at Council of Five Nations.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


1,348 hits since 14 Mar 2008
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

archstanton7314 Mar 2008 5:15 p.m. PST

As an avid 1745 jacobite Rebellion, AWI , Napoleonic and ACW gamer I was wondering when squares first truly came into common use and when they were last used against Western cavalry( as opposed to Sudanese or Zulus etc)?

hos45914 Mar 2008 6:51 p.m. PST

Well, since in terms of terminology we tend to lump solid squares, or mass' in with 'squares', you could say 'squares' have been in use since ancient times as infantry draw together in an ordered mass to defend against cavalry.

Certainly there are plenty of renaissance formations you could comfortably term squares.

archstanton7315 Mar 2008 7:02 a.m. PST

Well yes I know that but I mean linear musket armed infantry forming a 'square' to repulse cavalry attacks….

anvil115 Mar 2008 10:02 a.m. PST

I think during the era you are dealing with,, squares were always in common use. slightly earlier,, during the Renaissance, pikes in square were used extensively,,Charles XII used them during the GNW,, WSS,, SYW,, and on to the end of the era of blackpowder… Sometimes doctrine used them in different ways,, such as the SYW,, where discipline kept armies in long lines,,but they had a second line that could do an about face,,and grenadiers on the flanks that could either form square or form line facing outwards to create an army square as needed…

Obviously,, in wars where there was not much cav, squares were not commonly used… ;)

So I would say as long as there were linear musket armed infantry,, they were trained to form square in one way or another…

pretty general here,, but hope it helps

anvil

FatherOfAllLogic15 Mar 2008 10:08 a.m. PST

My impression was that squares were used as a last defense in a chaotic field situation, like a retreat in the face of a victorious enemy rather than as a tactical formation to repel cavalry, at least in the WSS. Later, ummm, I dunno….

Supercilius Maximus15 Mar 2008 10:37 a.m. PST

Post-pike, the (hollow) square was quite widely used by all European armies in a variety of situations where the enemy was attacking – or posing a threat – from more than one side. Contrary to popular myth, it was intended for use against infantry as well as cavalry, and as such was even employed on occasions (mostly by the British) during the AWI.

The first change to this, IMO, was the introduction of the "masse" (by the Austrians?) during the Napoleonic Wars. This was essentially a solid square/block where the imperative was to provide a formation that raw troops could use in attack or defence. In this conflict the main use of the square WAS against cavalry, due to the changing nature of the battlefield as the 18th Century "norm" of infantry in the centre and cavalry on both wings was replaced by the more fluid situations caused by the "corps de bataille" concept.

Bandit15 Mar 2008 11:26 a.m. PST

As far as "last used" I can tell you that one of the only known instances during the ACW was a regiment forming square against cavalry at Gettysburg on July 1st (Day 1), 1863.

I'm unaware of other examples later than that.

Cheers,

The Bandit

Gunfreak Supporting Member of TMP15 Mar 2008 1:36 p.m. PST

I think the brits used squares against natives in some of the imperial wars they had in the last part of the 1800s

Personal logo Der Alte Fritz Sponsoring Member of TMP15 Mar 2008 1:54 p.m. PST

The armies of the SYW nations all had regulations for the formation of squares, but they were rarely used due to the use of linear battle lines, usually anchored (flanks) on some terrain feature or with cavalry.

dasfrpsl15 Mar 2008 2:39 p.m. PST

Prussian infantry formed squares at the Battle of Langensalza against the Hanoverians in 1866. On of their squares was broken by the Hanoverian Garde Cuirassier Regiment and the Duke of Cambridge Dragoons.

donlowry15 Mar 2008 3:51 p.m. PST

Confederate infantry formed battalion squares at the Battle of the Opequon (aka 3rd Winchester) in the Shenandoah, 19 Sep 1864, when charged in the flank and rear by 5 brigades of Union cavalry. George Patton's grandfather (a Confederate colonel) was killed in that fight.

archstanton7315 Mar 2008 5:44 p.m. PST

Anvil, if they were used in the WSS then why didn't the French, British or other allies use them at Blenheim or Ramillies where repulsing cavalry (as at Waterloo) would have been highly useful…
Out of interest which battles in the AWI did the Brits use the square?

hos45915 Mar 2008 6:07 p.m. PST

Archstatnton I'll go back to my original statement…..for the period your talking about you can take it that such use's were already well established and pretty routine for all nations.

To expand on that you thne have to look at the circumstances, which gets to your question on Blenheim, Ramillies etc.

An isolated battalion will form square/mass/hollow square to defend against cavalry.

A battalion forming a line as part of a larger formation, is actually protecting the flanks of the battalions either siode of it (just as they protect its flanks). So, to form square means you are pulling away from the units left/right and leving their flanks open. So, as a formation, the whole is more secure if each battalion stays in line.

Dave Knight16 Mar 2008 2:20 a.m. PST

Certainly used by the British in the Sudan

Supercilius Maximus16 Mar 2008 2:47 a.m. PST

archstanton73,

Some references (suggest you read the whole thread in each case, as it often throws up more examples):-

link

link

link

link

link

link

link

link

The last one is a general discussion on British formations in the AWI that morphs into a discussion on squares.

anvil116 Mar 2008 7:42 a.m. PST

archstanton73

What hos459 said…

different docterine during different eras determined just how and when squares were used.

archstanton7316 Mar 2008 12:18 p.m. PST

Thanks Supercillius very informing..Will have to send in an amendment to Piquet FOB who state that squares weren't used in the AWI!!! They obviously were not needed as much as in cavalry rich environments but were still useful!! BTW on that last link they state that British AWI re-enactors were FARBS--What does that stand for?? (probably not polite!!!)

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.