I recently considered looking at researching small unit organisation for the British Army in the Great War – now before I go running back to the 1939-45 era where I can kid myself I know someting, I was hoping someone could answer a question that will otherwise continue to annoy me!
I signed up with the Great War forum, and a couple of the contributors have very kindly transcribed and posted details of the pre-war eight Company and early war four Company British Infantry Battalion establishments.
In the eight Company format, each Company was authorised three officers, one colour-sergeant, four sergeants, five corporals and 100 privates, plus two drummers, three batmen and two wagon drivers. My understanding is that this Company could be sub-divided into four sections. Confusingly, it seems that signallers, pioneers and stretcher bearers were counted in the Company totals so when removed would reduce the privates to around 92.
In the four Company format, each Company was authorised six officers, two colour-sergeants, eight sergeants, ten corporals and 188 privates, plus four drummers, six batmen and three wagon drivers. This Company was sub-divided into four Platoons.
The question most people on the GW forum (including myself) had was how the odd number of sergeants and corporals was arrived at? I was looking through the Osprey "British Redcoats 1793-1815" and was struck by the fact it gave a Company three officers, four sergeants and five corporals. A carry on of traditional appointments or pure coincidence?
In a Company subdivided into four sections, then four sergeants makes sense – but why five corporals? Likewise in a Company of four Platoons, why ten corporals? Eight sergeants sounds right if each Platoon could be handled as two equal sections, but I don't know if that was the case.
I should stress this is a purely paper exercise on my part as I'm well aware that units would have operated well below strength for the most part. I'm just curious if anyone knows the 'parade ground' look for these units so to speak.
Thanks,
Gary