"Regiment Games British Naval Landing Party " Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two on the Land
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset Rating:
Featured Showcase ArticleA puzzling item in the infantry set.
Featured Profile Article
Featured Book Review
Featured Movie Review
|
The Gray Ghost | 18 Nov 2007 8:40 a.m. PST |
How well would these fit with My Crusader early war british, scalewise? |
Extra Crispy | 18 Nov 2007 11:06 a.m. PST |
The crusader figs I've seen are of the super-chunky variety. The Naval Landing figs are much more anatomically correct so will probably look emaciated by comparison. |
General Montcalm | 18 Nov 2007 1:55 p.m. PST |
I have both and looking at the two together I agree with Extra Crispy in that the Regiment figures look a little thinner and a mill or so shorter. I use them together and it doesnt look odd. They blend well with Bolt Action and Artizan. |
Samurai Elb | 19 Nov 2007 2:44 a.m. PST |
I can only compare the Foundry Naval Landing Figures which I am painting at the moment with Crusader Darg Age Irish. These are the only Crusader figures I have. The Crusaders are chunkier as told but for me the difference are not so great that you cannot mix them. I mix the Crusaders with my Fondry Vikings (the late range) too. Werner G. Elb aka Samurai Elb |
General Montcalm | 19 Nov 2007 7:59 a.m. PST |
Samurai Elb – stick – wrong end of : ) |
|