Help support TMP


"Armour Penetration of LG40 Recoilless Rifle?" Topic


14 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Hordes of the Things


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Workbench Article

Painting Peter Pig's T26

Can the techniques used for painting giant sci-fi robots be applied to 15mm scale Russian tanks?


Featured Profile Article

First Look: 1:100 Armoured Flame-Thrower Platoon

Looking for something new for your Late-War WWII German forces?


Featured Movie Review


1,873 hits since 22 Mar 2007
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

The Membership System will be closing for maintenance in 1 minutes. Please finish anything that will involve the membership system, including membership changes or posting of messages.

Achtung Minen22 Mar 2007 6:46 a.m. PST

My search-fu is weak today, can anyone provide me with the armour penetration and maximum point-target range of the German LG40 75mm recoilless rifle? If you have the same info for its bigger cousin, the 105mm variant, that would help too! I'm pretty sure they both used HC or HEAT rounds, so the penetration should be consistant at any range.

Achtung Minen22 Mar 2007 9:03 a.m. PST

Just found the ranges of these weapons. Lexicon der Wehrmacht puts the 75mm range at a stunning 6 and a half kilometers while the 105mm LG42 can reach out to 8 kilometers. I've also read elsewhere that the backblast of these weapons was out to 50 meters. Still the ranges seem pretty long HEAT rockets. Here is a link to that site (it's in German): link

Achtung Minen22 Mar 2007 9:07 a.m. PST

And THIS site ( link ) puts the 75mm at 50mm penetration (30 degree plate). One down!

Griefbringer22 Mar 2007 9:21 a.m. PST

Those 6-8 kilometer ranges are probably at rather high elevation, so primarily for indirect fire.

Griefbringer

Bob in Edmonton22 Mar 2007 9:40 a.m. PST

Wow, I've got models of those in 6mm. Have to put them on the board next game! Talk about good stand off weapons!

LFreeman22 Mar 2007 10:15 a.m. PST

Yeah, but at that range, I'll bet they're just happy if they hit the earth, let alone the target.

With that huge backblast, to another FO, that will look like a giant sign saying "shoot me!"

I'm willing to bet their use was more subdued and hidden or only used when the range was such it could get a kill as 50mm, even at 30 degrees, isn't alot.
Larry

aecurtis Fezian22 Mar 2007 3:35 p.m. PST

I don't *even* want to get into this again!

Allen

Achtung Minen22 Mar 2007 9:37 p.m. PST

Well I can't find anything on the 105mm. I'm just going to guess that if the armour penetration of a HEAT round is roughly connected to the size of the round, and a 75mm round penetrates 50mm of armour, then a 105mm round probably penetrates around 70mm.

Mobius24 Mar 2007 1:51 p.m. PST

Range:
The 75mm was about 6800m. The 105mm was 7950m.

There was considerable backblast 50m-100m with debris throw up. The firer was suppose to stuff clay or mud in their ears to prevent eardrum bursting.

The HEAT rounds were the standard HEAT shell used in the same sized infantry howitzer.

Conrad25 Mar 2007 2:36 p.m. PST

Given the huge backblast from a RR, I doubt that they could even be "cocked-up" to give them any elevation at all. Killing the crew with a giant blast of debris would militate against getting a second shot in, after all.

crhkrebs03 Apr 2007 5:30 a.m. PST

I agree that the distances given are for maximum artillery (indirect) fire. But, as Conrad askes, how do you fire a open-ended recoiless gun in this way?

Ralph

Achtung Minen03 Apr 2007 5:44 a.m. PST

Some kind of elbow-macaroni like tube attached to the end would not be unfeasible, although I have never heard of the Germans using anything like it.

Griefbringer04 Apr 2007 12:31 a.m. PST

I would think that placing the RR on the backward slope of a hill would allow for the sufficient elevation without causing troubles with the back blast.

Griefbringer

GrotGnome04 Apr 2007 1:08 a.m. PST

The back blasts from 6 rockets launching from a nebelwerfer over a couple of seconds doesn't seem to bother the crew – they always fire indirectly.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.