|
Frederick writes: |
Agree about the Valley – for the other choices, some of the campaign suitability is reduced by the fact that they were very much influenced by key issues in the high command (Antietam springs to mind) or are likely lost causes (Wilderness or – not mentioned – the Franklin–Nashville Campaign in the West in 1864) |
Back to the Homepage
Editor in Chief Bill feels it's important to celebrate progress in one's personal hobby life.
335 hits since 10 May 2024
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
VOTING RESULTS | |||
Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
this is ridiculous | 0 | 0% | |
---|---|---|---|
Antietam | 2 | 2% | |
none of these/no opinion | 4 | 4% | |
Wilderness | 4 | 4% | |
all of these campaigns | 2 | 2% | |
Shenandoah Valley 1862 | 47 | 51% | |
Peninsula 1862 | 10 | 11% | |
Gettysburg | 11 | 12% | |
not my cup of tea | 4 | 4% | |
not my genre | 9 | 10% |
POLL IS CLOSED |
POLL DESCRIPTION | |
swammeyjoe writes: I'm curious what you all think is the ideal campaign of the war from a wargaming perspective. Not your favorite, or the biggest, or the most important to the result of the war, but the one with the broadest variety of common wargaming scenarios. Poll set up by Editor in Chief Bill , based on this previous poll. |